PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GNG.AX vs. PME.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GNG.AX vs. PME.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in GR Engineering Services Limited (GNG.AX) and Pro Medicus Limited (PME.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GNG.AX achieves a 39.25% return, which is significantly higher than PME.AX's -27.53% return. Over the past 10 years, GNG.AX has underperformed PME.AX with an annualized return of 28.78%, while PME.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 42.79% annualized return.


GNG.AX

1D
-0.66%
1M
30.11%
YTD
39.25%
6M
45.80%
1Y
125.15%
3Y*
56.17%
5Y*
44.91%
10Y*
28.78%

PME.AX

1D
-0.28%
1M
15.12%
YTD
-27.53%
6M
-37.06%
1Y
-43.29%
3Y*
37.42%
5Y*
27.28%
10Y*
42.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GNG.AX vs. PME.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GNG.AX
GR Engineering Services Limited
39.25%91.42%22.04%18.42%5.73%85.30%61.96%-20.65%-19.94%9.79%
PME.AX
Pro Medicus Limited
-27.53%-11.52%161.84%74.19%-11.11%83.31%53.66%106.06%25.55%83.18%

Correlation

The correlation between GNG.AX and PME.AX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2011

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GNG.AX vs. PME.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GNG.AX
GNG.AX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GNG.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNG.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNG.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GNG.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNG.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

PME.AX
PME.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
PME.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PME.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
PME.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
PME.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PME.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GNG.AX vs. PME.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GR Engineering Services Limited (GNG.AX) and Pro Medicus Limited (PME.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GNG.AXPME.AXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.77

-0.84

+3.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.09

-1.13

+4.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

0.85

+0.58

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.85

-0.64

+5.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.33

-1.12

+13.45

GNG.AX vs. PME.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GNG.AX Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is higher than the PME.AX Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GNG.AX and PME.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GNG.AXPME.AXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77

-0.84

+3.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.25

0.66

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.98

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.47

-0.12

Drawdowns

GNG.AX vs. PME.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNG.AX drawdown since its inception was -80.31%, smaller than the maximum PME.AX drawdown of -88.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNG.AX and PME.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GNG.AXPME.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.31%

-88.06%

+7.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.53%

-67.24%

+41.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.68%

-67.24%

+41.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.68%

-67.24%

+41.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.78%

-67.24%

+5.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-51.51%

+50.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.90%

-28.78%

-1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.07%

38.51%

-28.44%

Volatility

GNG.AX vs. PME.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GR Engineering Services Limited (GNG.AX) is 10.96%, while Pro Medicus Limited (PME.AX) has a volatility of 15.68%. This indicates that GNG.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PME.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GNG.AXPME.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.96%

15.68%

-4.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.92%

48.20%

-14.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.70%

50.99%

-6.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.79%

41.52%

-5.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.70%

43.43%

-2.73%

Dividends

GNG.AX vs. PME.AX - Dividend Comparison

GNG.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than PME.AX's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GNG.AX
GR Engineering Services Limited
3.97%4.94%7.69%8.56%9.31%5.71%4.92%7.50%10.28%3.47%7.38%12.18%
PME.AX
Pro Medicus Limited
0.39%0.25%0.16%0.31%0.40%0.24%0.35%0.31%0.55%0.46%0.62%0.60%

Financials

GNG.AX vs. PME.AX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GR Engineering Services Limited and Pro Medicus Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in AUD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GNG.AX and PME.AX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GNG.AX and PME.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer