PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GNG.AX vs. IBKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GNG.AX vs. IBKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in GR Engineering Services Limited (GNG.AX) and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GNG.AX is traded in AUD, while IBKR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBKR values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GNG.AX achieves a 39.25% return, which is significantly higher than IBKR's 27.11% return. Over the past 10 years, GNG.AX has outperformed IBKR with an annualized return of 28.78%, while IBKR has yielded a comparatively lower 25.69% annualized return.


GNG.AX

1D
-0.66%
1M
30.11%
YTD
39.25%
6M
45.80%
1Y
125.15%
3Y*
56.17%
5Y*
44.91%
10Y*
28.78%

IBKR

1D
-1.31%
1M
7.33%
YTD
27.11%
6M
24.49%
1Y
52.76%
3Y*
59.76%
5Y*
41.65%
10Y*
25.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GNG.AX vs. IBKR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GNG.AX
GR Engineering Services Limited
39.25%91.42%22.04%18.42%5.73%85.30%61.96%-20.65%-19.94%9.79%
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
27.11%35.75%136.01%15.22%-2.30%38.80%20.15%-13.61%2.83%51.28%

Correlation

The correlation between GNG.AX and IBKR is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2011

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GNG.AX vs. IBKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GNG.AX
GNG.AX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GNG.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNG.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNG.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GNG.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNG.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

IBKR
IBKR Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IBKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBKR Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
IBKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBKR Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GNG.AX vs. IBKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GR Engineering Services Limited (GNG.AX) and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GNG.AXIBKRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.26

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.85

3.03

+1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.33

6.76

+5.57

GNG.AX vs. IBKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GNG.AX Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is higher than the IBKR Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GNG.AX and IBKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GNG.AXIBKRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77

1.51

+1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.25

1.25

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.79

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.52

-0.16

Drawdowns

GNG.AX vs. IBKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNG.AX drawdown since its inception was -80.31%, which is greater than IBKR's maximum drawdown of -63.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNG.AX and IBKR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GNG.AXIBKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.31%

-63.68%

-16.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.53%

-17.51%

-8.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.68%

-35.53%

+9.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.68%

-35.53%

+9.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.78%

-45.05%

-16.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-1.31%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.90%

-24.69%

-5.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.07%

7.83%

+2.24%

Volatility

GNG.AX vs. IBKR - Volatility Comparison

GR Engineering Services Limited (GNG.AX) has a higher volatility of 10.96% compared to Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) at 10.02%. This indicates that GNG.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GNG.AXIBKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.96%

10.02%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.92%

24.85%

+9.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.70%

35.16%

+9.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.79%

33.58%

+2.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.70%

32.65%

+8.05%

Dividends

GNG.AX vs. IBKR - Dividend Comparison

GNG.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than IBKR's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GNG.AX
GR Engineering Services Limited
3.97%4.94%7.69%8.56%9.31%5.71%4.92%7.50%10.28%3.47%7.38%12.18%
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
0.38%0.47%0.48%0.48%0.55%0.50%0.66%0.86%0.73%0.68%1.10%0.92%

Financials

GNG.AX vs. IBKR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GR Engineering Services Limited and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. GNG.AX values in AUD, IBKR values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


GNG.AX and IBKR have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GNG.AX and IBKR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer