GMWZX vs. GGBFX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2025 Fund (GMWZX) and GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX).
GMWZX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Dec 28, 2006. GGBFX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Dec 28, 2006.
Performance
GMWZX vs. GGBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GMWZX vs. GGBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMWZX GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2025 Fund | -1.30% | 12.82% | 8.88% | 12.64% | -14.42% | 8.94% | 10.70% | 18.19% | -4.90% | 14.93% |
GGBFX GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund | -1.33% | 7.55% | 0.40% | 5.77% | -13.90% | -2.57% | 5.03% | 11.04% | -4.74% | 7.69% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GMWZX having a -1.30% return and GGBFX slightly lower at -1.33%. Over the past 10 years, GMWZX has outperformed GGBFX with an annualized return of 6.84%, while GGBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.91% annualized return.
GMWZX
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- YTD
- -1.30%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- 10.38%
- 3Y*
- 9.35%
- 5Y*
- 4.50%
- 10Y*
- 6.84%
GGBFX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- -1.33%
- 6M
- -0.79%
- 1Y
- 3.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.42%
- 5Y*
- -0.48%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GMWZX vs. GGBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMWZX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than GGBFX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GMWZX vs. GGBFX — Risk / Return Rank
GMWZX
GGBFX
GMWZX vs. GGBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2025 Fund (GMWZX) and GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMWZX | GGBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 0.98 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.82 | 1.41 | +0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.18 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 1.06 | +0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.60 | 4.31 | +3.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMWZX | GGBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 0.98 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | -0.10 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.43 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.69 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between GMWZX and GGBFX is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GMWZX vs. GGBFX - Dividend Comparison
GMWZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.60%, more than GGBFX's 3.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMWZX GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2025 Fund | 6.60% | 6.51% | 7.59% | 3.19% | 7.34% | 4.83% | 3.88% | 3.78% | 6.58% | 3.93% | 3.35% | 16.40% |
GGBFX GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund | 3.05% | 3.05% | 2.88% | 1.10% | 0.95% | 3.55% | 1.44% | 3.29% | 3.13% | 3.45% | 3.96% | 4.01% |
Drawdowns
GMWZX vs. GGBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMWZX drawdown since its inception was -51.44%, which is greater than GGBFX's maximum drawdown of -27.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMWZX and GGBFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMWZX | GGBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.44% | -27.03% | -24.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.12% | -3.80% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.61% | -20.84% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.65% | -20.97% | -0.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.06% | -5.48% | +1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.32% | -4.64% | -1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.42% | 0.94% | +0.48% |
Volatility
GMWZX vs. GGBFX - Volatility Comparison
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2025 Fund (GMWZX) has a higher volatility of 3.41% compared to GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX) at 1.76%. This indicates that GMWZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GMWZX | GGBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.41% | 1.76% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.07% | 2.63% | +2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.42% | 4.00% | +4.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.40% | 4.91% | +3.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.03% | 4.49% | +4.54% |