PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMWZX vs. GFSYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMWZX vs. GFSYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2025 Fund (GMWZX) and GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMWZX achieves a 5.84% return, which is significantly higher than GFSYX's 2.56% return.


GMWZX

1D
0.71%
1M
0.35%
6M
4.30%
YTD
5.84%
1Y
11.53%
3Y*
10.79%
5Y*
4.99%
10Y*
7.03%
ALL TIME*
5.52%

GFSYX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.99%
6M
3.25%
YTD
2.56%
1Y
5.99%
3Y*
6.18%
5Y*
4.71%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GMWZX vs. GFSYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMWZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2025 Fund
5.84%12.82%8.88%12.64%-14.42%8.94%10.70%18.19%-4.90%5.07%
GFSYX
GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund
2.56%5.49%7.60%5.98%-0.57%4.96%-0.17%4.94%0.14%1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between GMWZX and GFSYX is -0.17, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2017

0.18

The correlation between GMWZX and GFSYX shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMWZX vs. GFSYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GMWZX
GMWZX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
GMWZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMWZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMWZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
GMWZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMWZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

GFSYX
GFSYX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GFSYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFSYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFSYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
GFSYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFSYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GMWZX vs. GFSYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2025 Fund (GMWZX) and GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GMWZXGFSYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.50

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

4.67

-2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.64

11.78

-2.14

GMWZX vs. GFSYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMWZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is lower than the GFSYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMWZX and GFSYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMWZX vs. GFSYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMWZX drawdown since its inception was -51.44%, which is greater than GFSYX's maximum drawdown of -9.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMWZX and GFSYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMWZXGFSYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.44%

-9.54%

-41.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.59%

-1.34%

-4.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.91%

-4.49%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.61%

-4.49%

-15.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-0.11%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

-0.90%

-5.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.28%

0.53%

+0.75%

Volatility

GMWZX vs. GFSYX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2025 Fund (GMWZX) has a higher volatility of 2.20% compared to GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX) at 0.72%. This indicates that GMWZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFSYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMWZXGFSYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.20%

0.72%

+1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.23%

1.92%

+4.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.37%

2.55%

+4.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.56%

3.67%

+4.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.01%

3.69%

+5.32%

GMWZX vs. GFSYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMWZX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than GFSYX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMWZX vs. GFSYX - Dividend Comparison

GMWZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.15%, less than GFSYX's 7.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFSYX
GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund
7.00%7.18%8.54%13.00%4.20%1.59%1.53%2.24%2.17%0.70%0.00%0.00%
GMWZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2025 Fund
6.15%6.51%7.59%3.19%7.34%4.83%3.88%3.78%6.58%3.93%3.35%16.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMWZX and GFSYX have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMWZX has higher volatility (2.20%) compared to GFSYX (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMWZX dropped -51.44% vs GFSYX's -9.54%.

GFSYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMWZX and GFSYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer