GMWEX vs. GPTUX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideMark World ex-US Fund (GMWEX) and GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund (GPTUX).
GMWEX is managed by GuideMark. It was launched on Jun 29, 2001. GPTUX is managed by GuideMark. It was launched on Apr 28, 2011.
Performance
GMWEX vs. GPTUX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GMWEX vs. GPTUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMWEX GuideMark World ex-US Fund | -1.98% | 33.60% | 5.36% | 15.97% | -16.19% | 11.70% | 8.58% | 20.02% | -14.12% | 25.97% |
GPTUX GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund | -5.52% | 7.08% | 20.29% | 14.85% | -6.15% | 19.72% | -3.42% | 20.50% | -4.54% | 18.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMWEX achieves a -1.98% return, which is significantly higher than GPTUX's -5.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GMWEX having a 8.05% annualized return and GPTUX not far behind at 7.99%.
GMWEX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -9.45%
- YTD
- -1.98%
- 6M
- 3.25%
- 1Y
- 21.38%
- 3Y*
- 14.21%
- 5Y*
- 7.66%
- 10Y*
- 8.05%
GPTUX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -6.93%
- YTD
- -5.52%
- 6M
- -5.21%
- 1Y
- 5.02%
- 3Y*
- 11.28%
- 5Y*
- 8.11%
- 10Y*
- 7.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GMWEX vs. GPTUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMWEX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GPTUX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GMWEX vs. GPTUX — Risk / Return Rank
GMWEX
GPTUX
GMWEX vs. GPTUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideMark World ex-US Fund (GMWEX) and GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund (GPTUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMWEX | GPTUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 0.42 | +0.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.75 | 0.65 | +1.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.08 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 0.51 | +1.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.31 | 1.69 | +5.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMWEX | GPTUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 0.42 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.63 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.63 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.59 | -0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between GMWEX and GPTUX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GMWEX vs. GPTUX - Dividend Comparison
GMWEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.94%, more than GPTUX's 8.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMWEX GuideMark World ex-US Fund | 14.94% | 14.64% | 2.94% | 3.43% | 3.11% | 1.08% | 2.01% | 1.66% | 1.61% | 1.43% | 1.86% | 2.70% |
GPTUX GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund | 8.86% | 8.37% | 6.41% | 1.24% | 4.81% | 10.27% | 4.82% | 4.34% | 4.68% | 3.43% | 1.05% | 1.05% |
Drawdowns
GMWEX vs. GPTUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMWEX drawdown since its inception was -70.00%, which is greater than GPTUX's maximum drawdown of -22.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMWEX and GPTUX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMWEX | GPTUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.00% | -22.84% | -47.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | -8.31% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.28% | -16.31% | -14.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.51% | -22.84% | -12.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.66% | -8.16% | -1.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.22% | -4.36% | -26.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 2.49% | +0.16% |
Volatility
GMWEX vs. GPTUX - Volatility Comparison
GuideMark World ex-US Fund (GMWEX) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to GuidePath Tactical Allocation Fund (GPTUX) at 3.98%. This indicates that GMWEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPTUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GMWEX | GPTUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 3.98% | +2.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 9.24% | +1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.24% | 13.15% | +3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.49% | 12.90% | +2.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 12.78% | +3.37% |