PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMWAX vs. GQEFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMWAX vs. GQEFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Global Asset Allocation Fund (GMWAX) and GMO Quality Fund Class IV (GQEFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMWAX achieves a 12.22% return, which is significantly higher than GQEFX's 6.09% return.


GMWAX

1D
0.26%
1M
4.15%
YTD
12.22%
6M
14.10%
1Y
29.29%
3Y*
15.27%
5Y*
6.50%
10Y*
7.57%

GQEFX

1D
0.00%
1M
4.08%
YTD
6.09%
6M
7.49%
1Y
23.30%
3Y*
17.83%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMWAX vs. GQEFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMWAX
GMO Global Asset Allocation Fund
12.22%23.40%0.23%16.17%-12.71%7.03%6.15%17.70%-7.21%6.61%
GQEFX
GMO Quality Fund Class IV
6.09%19.64%17.54%28.95%-15.30%31.76%18.39%31.87%0.54%10.45%

Correlation

The correlation between GMWAX and GQEFX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2017

0.82

The correlation between GMWAX and GQEFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMWAX vs. GQEFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMWAX
GMWAX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GMWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GMWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

GQEFX
GQEFX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GQEFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQEFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQEFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GQEFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQEFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMWAX vs. GQEFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Global Asset Allocation Fund (GMWAX) and GMO Quality Fund Class IV (GQEFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMWAXGQEFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.40

1.95

+1.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.80

2.76

+2.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.34

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.31

1.86

+2.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.61

7.41

+9.20

GMWAX vs. GQEFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMWAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.40, which is higher than the GQEFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMWAX and GQEFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMWAXGQEFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.40

1.95

+1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.85

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.89

-0.57

Drawdowns

GMWAX vs. GQEFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMWAX drawdown since its inception was -41.69%, which is greater than GQEFX's maximum drawdown of -30.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMWAX and GQEFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMWAXGQEFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.69%

-30.42%

-11.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.87%

-12.74%

+5.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.17%

-15.55%

+2.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.47%

-24.22%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.23%

-4.17%

-7.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

3.20%

-1.42%

Volatility

GMWAX vs. GQEFX - Volatility Comparison

GMO Global Asset Allocation Fund (GMWAX) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to GMO Quality Fund Class IV (GQEFX) at 2.74%. This indicates that GMWAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQEFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMWAXGQEFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

2.74%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.91%

9.48%

-2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.81%

12.24%

-3.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.01%

15.87%

-5.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.35%

17.76%

-7.41%

GMWAX vs. GQEFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMWAX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than GQEFX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMWAX vs. GQEFX - Dividend Comparison

GMWAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, less than GQEFX's 10.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMWAX
GMO Global Asset Allocation Fund
4.34%4.88%0.14%5.47%3.78%6.16%4.00%4.00%3.77%2.50%2.25%3.13%
GQEFX
GMO Quality Fund Class IV
10.51%11.15%3.70%3.43%11.84%10.23%13.62%8.09%21.69%7.08%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMWAX and GQEFX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMWAX has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to GQEFX (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMWAX dropped -41.69% vs GQEFX's -30.42%.

GMWAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.40 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMWAX and GQEFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer