PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMWAX vs. GMGEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMWAX vs. GMGEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Global Asset Allocation Fund (GMWAX) and GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMWAX achieves a 12.22% return, which is significantly lower than GMGEX's 19.07% return. Over the past 10 years, GMWAX has underperformed GMGEX with an annualized return of 7.57%, while GMGEX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.26% annualized return.


GMWAX

1D
0.26%
1M
4.15%
YTD
12.22%
6M
14.10%
1Y
29.29%
3Y*
15.27%
5Y*
6.50%
10Y*
7.57%

GMGEX

1D
0.29%
1M
6.47%
YTD
19.07%
6M
21.73%
1Y
41.45%
3Y*
21.71%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*
11.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMWAX vs. GMGEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMWAX
GMO Global Asset Allocation Fund
12.22%23.40%0.23%16.17%-12.71%7.03%6.15%17.70%-7.21%15.73%
GMGEX
GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund
19.07%29.14%4.12%22.27%-17.07%14.99%9.55%25.45%-13.04%26.39%

Correlation

The correlation between GMWAX and GMGEX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1997

0.96

The correlation between GMWAX and GMGEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMWAX vs. GMGEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMWAX
GMWAX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GMWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GMWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

GMGEX
GMGEX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GMGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GMGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMWAX vs. GMGEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Global Asset Allocation Fund (GMWAX) and GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMWAXGMGEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.40

3.36

+0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.80

4.58

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.62

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.31

4.56

-0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.61

18.14

-1.53

GMWAX vs. GMGEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMWAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.40, which is comparable to the GMGEX Sharpe Ratio of 3.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMWAX and GMGEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMWAXGMGEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.40

3.36

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.67

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.70

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.25

+0.07

Drawdowns

GMWAX vs. GMGEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMWAX drawdown since its inception was -41.69%, smaller than the maximum GMGEX drawdown of -58.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMWAX and GMGEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMWAXGMGEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.69%

-58.47%

+16.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.87%

-9.24%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.17%

-17.12%

+3.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.47%

-28.58%

+6.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.12%

-34.98%

+9.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.23%

-16.75%

+5.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

2.32%

-0.54%

Volatility

GMWAX vs. GMGEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GMO Global Asset Allocation Fund (GMWAX) is 3.05%, while GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that GMWAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMGEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMWAXGMGEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

4.06%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.91%

9.90%

-2.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.81%

12.66%

-3.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.01%

14.80%

-4.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.35%

16.06%

-5.71%

GMWAX vs. GMGEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMWAX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than GMGEX's 0.01% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GMWAX vs. GMGEX - Dividend Comparison

GMWAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, more than GMGEX's 3.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMGEX
GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund
3.93%4.69%0.29%5.62%7.81%7.76%3.83%3.14%3.14%2.90%3.71%4.20%
GMWAX
GMO Global Asset Allocation Fund
4.34%4.88%0.14%5.47%3.78%6.16%4.00%4.00%3.77%2.50%2.25%3.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, GMWAX and GMGEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GMGEX has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to GMWAX (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMWAX dropped -41.69% vs GMGEX's -58.47%.

GMWAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.40 vs 3.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMWAX and GMGEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer