GQEFX vs. GMCDX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GQEFX (GMO Quality Fund Class IV) and GMCDX (GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund) are both mutual funds - GQEFX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by GMO, while GMCDX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by GMO. Over the past 5 years, GQEFX returned 13.43%/yr vs 9.64%/yr for GMCDX. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GQEFX charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for GMCDX.

Performance

GQEFX vs. GMCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Quality Fund Class IV (GQEFX) and GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund (GMCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQEFX achieves a 6.09% return, which is significantly lower than GMCDX's 8.70% return.

GQEFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 4.08%
• YTD: 6.09%
• 6M: 7.49%
• 1Y: 23.30%
• 3Y*: 17.83%
• 5Y*: 13.43%
• 10Y*: —

GMCDX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 1.66%
• YTD: 8.70%
• 6M: 9.24%
• 1Y: 26.65%
• 3Y*: 20.34%
• 5Y*: 9.64%
• 10Y*: 7.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQEFX vs. GMCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GQEFX GMO Quality Fund Class IV	6.09%	19.64%	17.54%	28.95%	-15.30%	31.76%	18.39%	31.87%	0.54%	10.45%
GMCDX GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund	8.70%	22.34%	13.39%	17.63%	-16.30%	6.56%	7.25%	14.28%	-5.89%	3.03%

Correlation

The correlation between GQEFX and GMCDX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2017	0.31

The correlation between GQEFX and GMCDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GQEFX vs. GMCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQEFX

GQEFX Risk / Return Rank: 37
GQEFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
GQEFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
GQEFX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
GQEFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
GQEFX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

GMCDX

GMCDX Risk / Return Rank: 98
GMCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
GMCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
GMCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
GMCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
GMCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQEFX vs. GMCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Quality Fund Class IV (GQEFX) and GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund (GMCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GQEFX	GMCDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	5.17	-3.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	9.25	-6.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	2.30	-0.97
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	7.12	-5.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.41	30.83	-23.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GQEFX vs. GMCDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQEFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is lower than the GMCDX Sharpe Ratio of 5.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQEFX and GMCDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GQEFX	GMCDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.95	5.17	-3.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85	0.86	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	0.32	+0.58

Drawdowns

GQEFX vs. GMCDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQEFX drawdown since its inception was -30.42%, smaller than the maximum GMCDX drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQEFX and GMCDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GQEFX	GMCDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.42%	-68.24%	+37.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.74%	-3.85%	-8.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.55%	-9.00%	-6.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.22%	-26.02%	+1.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-26.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.17%	-17.66%	+13.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.20%	0.89%	+2.31%

Volatility

GQEFX vs. GMCDX - Volatility Comparison

GMO Quality Fund Class IV (GQEFX) has a higher volatility of 2.74% compared to GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund (GMCDX) at 1.52%. This indicates that GQEFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMCDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GQEFX	GMCDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.74%	1.52%	+1.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.48%	4.37%	+5.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.24%	5.30%	+6.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.87%	11.20%	+4.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.76%	9.33%	+8.43%

GQEFX vs. GMCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQEFX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than GMCDX's 0.53% expense ratio.

Dividends

GQEFX vs. GMCDX - Dividend Comparison

GQEFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.51%, more than GMCDX's 5.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GMCDX GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund	5.77%	6.27%	6.88%	10.26%	13.73%	17.75%	9.66%	6.60%	7.76%	7.06%	6.00%	2.50%
GQEFX GMO Quality Fund Class IV	10.51%	11.15%	3.70%	3.43%	11.84%	10.23%	13.62%	8.09%	21.69%	7.08%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GQEFX and GMCDX in my portfolio?

GQEFX and GMCDX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GQEFX or GMCDX?

GQEFX has higher volatility (2.74%) compared to GMCDX (1.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQEFX dropped -30.42% vs GMCDX's -68.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMCDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.17 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.