PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMUN vs. ZMUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMUN vs. ZMUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF (GMUN) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GMUN

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZMUN

1D
0.06%
1M
0.29%
6M
1.83%
YTD
2.03%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMUN vs. ZMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GMUN and ZMUN is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMUN vs. ZMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF (GMUN) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GMUN vs. ZMUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMUN vs. ZMUN - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMUNZMUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.02%

Volatility

GMUN vs. ZMUN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMUNZMUNDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.54%

GMUN vs. ZMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMUN has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ZMUN's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMUN vs. ZMUN - Dividend Comparison

GMUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZMUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%.


PositionTTM202520242023
GMUN
Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF
2.87%2.94%3.22%2.20%
ZMUN
F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF
2.59%0.70%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMUN and ZMUN have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GMUN is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GMUN is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZMUN.

GMUN has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 2.59% for ZMUN.

GMUN tracks Bloomberg Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Index, while ZMUN tracks Bloomberg Municipal Bond Currently Callable Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GMUN and 0.30% for ZMUN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMUN and ZMUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer