PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMUN vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMUN vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF (GMUN) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMUN achieves a -0.34% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 70.69% return.


GMUN

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.79%
YTD
-0.34%
6M
0.02%
1Y
4.76%
3Y*
3.06%
5Y*
10Y*

UGA

1D
-2.73%
1M
-12.25%
YTD
70.69%
6M
59.72%
1Y
79.48%
3Y*
20.80%
5Y*
24.41%
10Y*
14.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMUN vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GMUN
Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF
-0.34%5.92%0.31%3.68%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
70.69%-2.00%3.77%4.67%

Correlation

The correlation between GMUN and UGA is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2023

-0.15

The correlation between GMUN and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to -0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMUN vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMUN
GMUN Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
GMUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMUN Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GMUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMUN Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMUN vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF (GMUN) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMUNUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.37

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

5.37

-3.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.36

12.86

-7.50

GMUN vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMUN Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMUN and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMUNUGADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

2.27

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.12

+0.88

Drawdowns

GMUN vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMUN drawdown since its inception was -4.35%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMUN and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMUNUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-86.59%

+82.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-14.88%

+12.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.37%

-26.68%

+23.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.29%

-14.75%

+12.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.02%

-36.76%

+35.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

6.20%

-5.28%

Volatility

GMUN vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF (GMUN) is 1.09%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 11.64%. This indicates that GMUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMUNUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

11.64%

-10.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.00%

30.48%

-28.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42%

35.27%

-32.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.96%

34.40%

-31.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.96%

37.27%

-34.31%

GMUN vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMUN has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMUN vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

GMUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
GMUN
Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF
3.12%2.94%3.22%2.20%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMUN and UGA have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGA has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to GMUN (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMUN dropped -4.35% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 3-year performance, UGA leads with 20.80% vs 3.06% for GMUN. On fees, GMUN is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GMUN has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, UGA has performed better with a 20.80% return vs 3.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GMUN is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

GMUN has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

GMUN is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while UGA is Oil & Gas. GMUN tracks Bloomberg Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GMUN and 0.75% for UGA.

UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMUN and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer