GMUB vs. TAXI

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GMUB (Goldman Sachs Municipal Income ETF) and TAXI (Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. GMUB is actively managed, while TAXI is passively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GMUB charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for TAXI.

Performance

GMUB vs. TAXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Municipal Income ETF (GMUB) and Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMUB achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly higher than TAXI's 0.97% return.

GMUB

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 1.59%
• 6M: 2.38%
• 1Y: 7.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TAXI

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 0.97%
• 6M: 1.59%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMUB vs. TAXI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GMUB Goldman Sachs Municipal Income ETF	1.59%	3.93%
TAXI Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF	0.97%	3.35%

Correlation

The correlation between GMUB and TAXI is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025	0.61

Return for Risk

GMUB vs. TAXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMUB

GMUB Risk / Return Rank: 78
GMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
GMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
GMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 88
GMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
GMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMUB vs. TAXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Municipal Income ETF (GMUB) and Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GMUB	TAXI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.29	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.23	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.69	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GMUB	TAXI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.42	2.95	-1.53

Drawdowns

GMUB vs. TAXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMUB drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, which is greater than TAXI's maximum drawdown of -2.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMUB and TAXI.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMUB	TAXI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.28%	-2.23%	-1.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.43%	-0.77%	+0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.63%	-0.46%	-0.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.63%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GMUB	TAXI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.79%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.90%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.75%	1.90%	+0.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.30%	1.90%	+1.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.30%	1.90%	+1.40%

GMUB vs. TAXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMUB has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXI's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GMUB vs. TAXI - Dividend Comparison

GMUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than TAXI's 2.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GMUB Goldman Sachs Municipal Income ETF	3.26%	3.14%	1.46%
TAXI Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF	2.00%	0.85%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMUB and TAXI in my portfolio?

GMUB and TAXI have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GMUB or TAXI?

On fees, TAXI is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GMUB or TAXI?

TAXI is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for GMUB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GMUB or TAXI?

GMUB has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.00% for TAXI.

What is the main difference between GMUB and TAXI?

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for GMUB and 0.05% for TAXI.