PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMUB vs. GMUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GMUB vs. GMUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Municipal Income ETF (GMUB) and Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF (GMUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GMUB vs. GMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GMUB
Goldman Sachs Municipal Income ETF
0.32%5.99%1.08%
GMUN
Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF
-0.23%5.92%0.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMUB achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly higher than GMUN's -0.23% return.


GMUB

1D
0.24%
1M
-1.52%
YTD
0.32%
6M
2.04%
1Y
5.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GMUN

1D
0.24%
1M
-1.90%
YTD
-0.23%
6M
1.15%
1Y
5.05%
3Y*
2.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GMUB vs. GMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMUB has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than GMUN's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

GMUB vs. GMUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMUB
GMUB Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

GMUN
GMUN Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
GMUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMUN Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
GMUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMUN Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMUB vs. GMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Municipal Income ETF (GMUB) and Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF (GMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMUBGMUNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

1.65

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.14

2.08

+0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.41

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

1.91

+0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.71

6.60

+1.11

GMUB vs. GMUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMUB Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the GMUN Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMUB and GMUN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMUBGMUNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.65

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

1.07

+0.23

Correlation

The correlation between GMUB and GMUN is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GMUB vs. GMUN - Dividend Comparison

GMUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than GMUN's 3.08% yield.


TTM202520242023
GMUB
Goldman Sachs Municipal Income ETF
3.20%3.14%1.46%0.00%
GMUN
Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF
3.08%2.94%3.22%2.20%

Drawdowns

GMUB vs. GMUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMUB drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum GMUN drawdown of -4.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMUB and GMUN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GMUBGMUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-4.35%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

-2.83%

+0.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-2.19%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.60%

-0.98%

+0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.82%

-0.04%

Volatility

GMUB vs. GMUN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Municipal Income ETF (GMUB) is 1.11%, while Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF (GMUN) has a volatility of 1.22%. This indicates that GMUB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GMUBGMUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

1.22%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.89%

1.62%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.53%

3.09%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.39%

2.95%

+0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.39%

2.95%

+0.44%