GMOV vs. GMOD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GMOV (GMO U.S. Value ETF) and GMOD (GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GMOV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Value (Gross), while GMOD is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by GMO. GMOV is passively managed, while GMOD is actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

GMOV vs. GMOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO U.S. Value ETF (GMOV) and GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMOV achieves a 9.39% return, which is significantly higher than GMOD's 6.36% return.

GMOV

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -1.39%
• YTD: 9.39%
• 6M: 8.82%
• 1Y: 23.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GMOD

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: -0.00%
• YTD: 6.36%
• 6M: 6.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMOV vs. GMOD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GMOV GMO U.S. Value ETF	9.39%	6.69%
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF	6.36%	4.35%

Correlation

The correlation between GMOV and GMOD is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025	0.69

Return for Risk

GMOV vs. GMOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMOV

GMOV Risk / Return Rank: 76
GMOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
GMOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
GMOV Omega Ratio Rank: 71
GMOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
GMOV Martin Ratio Rank: 75

GMOD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMOV vs. GMOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO U.S. Value ETF (GMOV) and GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GMOV	GMOD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.90	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.96	—	—

Drawdowns

GMOV vs. GMOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMOV drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, which is greater than GMOD's maximum drawdown of -6.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOV and GMOD.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMOV	GMOD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.71%	-6.50%	-10.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.81%	-1.51%	-0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.79%	-1.13%	-1.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.82%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GMOV	GMOD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.29%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.43%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.96%	9.07%	+1.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.86%	9.07%	+5.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.86%	9.07%	+5.79%

GMOV vs. GMOD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GMOV and GMOD have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

GMOV vs. GMOD - Dividend Comparison

GMOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than GMOD's 0.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF	0.88%	0.93%	0.00%
GMOV GMO U.S. Value ETF	2.04%	1.98%	0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMOV and GMOD in my portfolio?

GMOV and GMOD have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GMOV or GMOD?

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GMOV or GMOD?

GMOV and GMOD have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GMOV or GMOD?

GMOV has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.88% for GMOD.

What is the main difference between GMOV and GMOD?

GMOV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while GMOD is Tactical Allocation.