GMOM vs. VFMO
GMOM (Cambria Global Momentum ETF) and VFMO (Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GMOM returned 7.06%/yr vs 14.03%/yr for VFMO. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GMOM charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMO.
Performance
GMOM vs. VFMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMOM achieves a 11.82% return, which is significantly lower than VFMO's 24.71% return.
GMOM
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 11.82%
- 6M
- 13.95%
- 1Y
- 29.52%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- 7.62%
VFMO
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 4.64%
- YTD
- 24.71%
- 6M
- 22.49%
- 1Y
- 44.76%
- 3Y*
- 28.43%
- 5Y*
- 14.03%
- 10Y*
- —
GMOM vs. VFMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMOM Cambria Global Momentum ETF | 11.82% | 20.63% | 6.75% | 0.65% | -2.82% | 19.13% | 2.42% | 8.24% | -11.74% |
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 24.71% | 17.39% | 26.14% | 16.25% | -12.84% | 19.16% | 31.36% | 28.22% | -11.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMOM and VFMO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018 | 0.64 |
The correlation between GMOM and VFMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
GMOM vs. VFMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GMOM
VFMO
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
GMOM
VFMO
Industrials
GMOM
VFMO
Basic Materials
GMOM
VFMO
Financial Services
GMOM
VFMO
Utilities
GMOM
VFMO
Technology
GMOM
VFMO
Consumer Cyclical
GMOM
VFMO
Communication Services
GMOM
VFMO
Consumer Defensive
GMOM
VFMO
Real Estate
GMOM
VFMO
Healthcare
GMOM
VFMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMOM vs. VFMO — Risk / Return Rank
GMOM
VFMO
GMOM vs. VFMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMOM | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.36 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 4.09 | -1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.12 | 15.46 | -3.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMOM | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 2.12 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.65 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.66 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
GMOM vs. VFMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMOM drawdown since its inception was -25.03%, smaller than the maximum VFMO drawdown of -36.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOM and VFMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMOM | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.03% | -36.77% | +11.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.57% | -10.98% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.73% | -24.40% | +10.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.16% | -25.80% | +6.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | 0.00% | -1.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.81% | -7.76% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 2.90% | -0.46% |
Volatility
GMOM vs. VFMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) is 3.23%, while Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) has a volatility of 6.05%. This indicates that GMOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMOM | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.23% | 6.05% | -2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.18% | 16.38% | -5.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.61% | 21.21% | -7.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.41% | 21.70% | -7.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.82% | 23.56% | -10.74% |
GMOM vs. VFMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMOM has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
GMOM vs. VFMO - Dividend Comparison
GMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than VFMO's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMOM Cambria Global Momentum ETF | 1.58% | 3.01% | 2.16% | 3.63% | 2.52% | 3.42% | 1.24% | 2.60% | 1.90% | 2.05% | 1.77% | 1.88% |
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.62% | 0.82% | 0.72% | 0.89% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 0.45% | 1.22% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GMOM and VFMO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFMO has higher volatility (6.05%) compared to GMOM (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMOM dropped -25.03% vs VFMO's -36.77%.
On 5-year performance, VFMO leads with 14.03% vs 7.06% for GMOM. On fees, VFMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, GMOM has been the lower-risk option at 3.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VFMO has performed better with a 14.03% return vs 7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for GMOM.
GMOM has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.62% for VFMO.
They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for GMOM and 0.13% for VFMO.
GMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GMOM and VFMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer