PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMOM vs. TAIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMOM vs. TAIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMOM achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly higher than TAIL's -6.17% return.


GMOM

1D
-0.57%
1M
0.88%
YTD
11.55%
6M
13.63%
1Y
29.29%
3Y*
13.75%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
7.69%

TAIL

1D
-0.05%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
-6.17%
6M
-7.55%
1Y
-8.73%
3Y*
-5.76%
5Y*
-8.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMOM vs. TAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMOM
Cambria Global Momentum ETF
11.55%20.63%6.75%0.65%-2.82%19.13%2.42%8.24%-9.61%11.40%
TAIL
Cambria Tail Risk ETF
-6.17%5.48%-9.62%-13.29%-13.13%-12.81%6.91%-14.27%2.85%-7.70%

Correlation

The correlation between GMOM and TAIL is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017

-0.37

GMOM vs. TAIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GMOM
TAIL

Energy

20.7%
3.5%

Industrials

16.1%
8.3%

Basic Materials

15.6%
1.8%

Financial Services

12.0%
11.8%

Utilities

11.0%
2.4%

Technology

8.4%
35.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
10.1%

Communication Services

4.1%
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
4.9%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.9%

Healthcare

1.1%
8.5%

Energy

GMOM
20.7%
TAIL
3.5%

Industrials

GMOM
16.1%
TAIL
8.3%

Basic Materials

GMOM
15.6%
TAIL
1.8%

Financial Services

GMOM
12.0%
TAIL
11.8%

Utilities

GMOM
11.0%
TAIL
2.4%

Technology

GMOM
8.4%
TAIL
35.6%

Consumer Cyclical

GMOM
5.4%
TAIL
10.1%

Communication Services

GMOM
4.1%
TAIL
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

GMOM
3.5%
TAIL
4.9%

Real Estate

GMOM
2.2%
TAIL
1.9%

Healthcare

GMOM
1.1%
TAIL
8.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMOM vs. TAIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMOM
GMOM Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
GMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
GMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

TAIL
TAIL Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
TAIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAIL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
TAIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAIL Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMOM vs. TAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMOMTAILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

0.83

+0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

-0.80

+3.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.03

-2.01

+14.05

GMOM vs. TAIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMOM Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the TAIL Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMOM and TAIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMOMTAILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

-1.03

+3.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

-0.57

+1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

-0.48

+0.98

Drawdowns

GMOM vs. TAIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMOM drawdown since its inception was -25.03%, smaller than the maximum TAIL drawdown of -52.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOM and TAIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMOMTAILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.03%

-52.36%

+27.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.57%

-10.95%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.73%

-20.65%

+6.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.16%

-38.44%

+19.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.09%

-51.56%

+49.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.81%

-29.12%

+21.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

4.35%

-1.91%

Volatility

GMOM vs. TAIL - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) at 0.86%. This indicates that GMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMOMTAILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

0.86%

+2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.18%

6.45%

+4.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.61%

8.51%

+5.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.41%

14.90%

-0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.82%

14.94%

-2.12%

GMOM vs. TAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMOM has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than TAIL's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMOM vs. TAIL - Dividend Comparison

GMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than TAIL's 3.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMOM
Cambria Global Momentum ETF
1.58%3.01%2.16%3.63%2.52%3.42%1.24%2.60%1.90%2.05%1.77%1.88%
TAIL
Cambria Tail Risk ETF
3.49%2.88%3.48%3.74%1.50%0.49%0.36%1.58%1.52%0.91%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMOM and TAIL have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMOM has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to TAIL (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMOM dropped -25.03% vs TAIL's -52.36%.

On 5-year performance, GMOM leads with 7.01% vs -8.38% for TAIL. On fees, TAIL is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, TAIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GMOM has performed better with a 7.01% return vs -8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TAIL is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for GMOM.

TAIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 1.58% for GMOM.

GMOM is categorized as Momentum, while TAIL is Volatility Hedged Equity. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for GMOM and 0.59% for TAIL.

GMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMOM and TAIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer