GMOM vs. ENDW

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

GMOM (Cambria Global Momentum ETF) and ENDW (Cambria Endowment Style ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Cambria, while ENDW is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Cambria. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GMOM returned 24.88% vs 23.85% for ENDW. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GMOM charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for ENDW.

Performance

GMOM vs. ENDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) and Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMOM achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly lower than ENDW's 13.27% return.

GMOM

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 4.48%
• 6M: 1.88%
• YTD: 10.77%
• 1Y: 24.88%
• 3Y*: 12.63%
• 5Y*: 7.64%
• 10Y*: 7.18%
• ALL TIME*: 5.87%

ENDW

• 1D: 1.07%
• 1M: 3.57%
• 6M: 7.98%
• YTD: 13.27%
• 1Y: 23.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 33.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ENDW Cambria Endowment Style ETF	$396.22K	$551.01K	$404.66K
GMOM Cambria Global Momentum ETF	$382.91K	$314.43K	$258.97K

GMOM vs. ENDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GMOM Cambria Global Momentum ETF	10.77%	25.96%
ENDW Cambria Endowment Style ETF	13.27%	29.25%

Correlation

The correlation between GMOM and ENDW is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2025	0.75

The correlation between GMOM and ENDW shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.86 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GMOM vs. ENDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GMOM

GMOM Risk / Return Rank: 63
GMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
GMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
GMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 63
GMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
GMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 59

ENDW

ENDW Risk / Return Rank: 87
ENDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
ENDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
ENDW Omega Ratio Rank: 87
ENDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
ENDW Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GMOM vs. ENDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) and Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GMOM	ENDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	2.31	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.29	3.12	-0.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.42	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	3.72	-1.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.84	14.39	-6.55

GMOM vs. ENDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the ENDW Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMOM and ENDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GMOM vs. ENDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMOM drawdown since its inception was -25.03%, which is greater than ENDW's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOM and ENDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMOM	ENDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.03%	-6.44%	-18.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.57%	-6.44%	-3.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.16%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.78%	0.00%	-2.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.77%	-0.85%	-6.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.18%	1.66%	+1.52%

Volatility

GMOM vs. ENDW - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW) at 2.44%. This indicates that GMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GMOM	ENDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.25%	2.44%	+0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.34%	8.02%	+3.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.72%	10.45%	+4.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.36%	11.02%	+3.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.95%	11.02%	+1.93%

GMOM vs. ENDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMOM has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than ENDW's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

GMOM vs. ENDW - Dividend Comparison

GMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than ENDW's 2.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENDW Cambria Endowment Style ETF	2.41%	1.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GMOM Cambria Global Momentum ETF	1.47%	3.01%	2.16%	3.63%	2.52%	3.42%	1.24%	2.60%	1.90%	2.05%	1.77%	1.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMOM and ENDW in my portfolio?

GMOM and ENDW have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GMOM or ENDW?

GMOM has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to ENDW (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMOM dropped -25.03% vs ENDW's -6.44%.

Which ETF is better, GMOM or ENDW?

On 1-year performance, GMOM leads with 24.88% vs 23.85% for ENDW. On fees, ENDW is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, ENDW has been the lower-risk option at 2.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GMOM or ENDW?

Over the 1-year period, GMOM has performed better with a 24.88% return vs 23.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GMOM or ENDW?

ENDW is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for GMOM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GMOM or ENDW?

ENDW has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 1.47% for GMOM.

What is the main difference between GMOM and ENDW?

GMOM is categorized as Momentum, while ENDW is Global Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for GMOM and 0.29% for ENDW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ENDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.