GMOM vs. DVOL
GMOM (Cambria Global Momentum ETF) and DVOL (First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF) are both Momentum funds. GMOM is actively managed, while DVOL is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GMOM returned 7.01%/yr vs 6.82%/yr for DVOL. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GMOM charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for DVOL.
Performance
GMOM vs. DVOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMOM achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly higher than DVOL's 1.61% return.
GMOM
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 11.55%
- 6M
- 13.63%
- 1Y
- 29.29%
- 3Y*
- 13.75%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- 7.69%
DVOL
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 0.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.78%
- 5Y*
- 6.82%
- 10Y*
- —
GMOM vs. DVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMOM Cambria Global Momentum ETF | 11.55% | 20.63% | 6.75% | 0.65% | -2.82% | 19.13% | 2.42% | 8.24% | -7.16% |
DVOL First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF | 1.61% | 4.30% | 24.84% | 5.39% | -16.10% | 30.08% | 11.15% | 26.10% | -9.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMOM and DVOL is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2018 | 0.48 |
The correlation between GMOM and DVOL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
GMOM vs. DVOL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GMOM
DVOL
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
GMOM
DVOL
Industrials
GMOM
DVOL
Basic Materials
GMOM
DVOL
Financial Services
GMOM
DVOL
Utilities
GMOM
DVOL
Technology
GMOM
DVOL
Consumer Cyclical
GMOM
DVOL
Communication Services
GMOM
DVOL
Consumer Defensive
GMOM
DVOL
Real Estate
GMOM
DVOL
Healthcare
GMOM
DVOL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMOM vs. DVOL — Risk / Return Rank
GMOM
DVOL
GMOM vs. DVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMOM | DVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.02 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 0.08 | +2.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.03 | 0.30 | +11.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMOM | DVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 0.07 | +2.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.48 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.50 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
GMOM vs. DVOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMOM drawdown since its inception was -25.03%, smaller than the maximum DVOL drawdown of -38.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOM and DVOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMOM | DVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.03% | -38.26% | +13.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.57% | -9.82% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.73% | -11.66% | -2.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.16% | -24.65% | +5.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.09% | -4.85% | +2.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.81% | -7.17% | -0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 2.87% | -0.43% |
Volatility
GMOM vs. DVOL - Volatility Comparison
Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL) at 2.91%. This indicates that GMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMOM | DVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 2.91% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.18% | 9.35% | +1.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.61% | 11.79% | +1.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.41% | 14.40% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.82% | 17.72% | -4.90% |
GMOM vs. DVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMOM has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than DVOL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
GMOM vs. DVOL - Dividend Comparison
GMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than DVOL's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVOL First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF | 0.68% | 0.86% | 0.67% | 1.28% | 1.37% | 0.47% | 0.60% | 1.79% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GMOM Cambria Global Momentum ETF | 1.58% | 3.01% | 2.16% | 3.63% | 2.52% | 3.42% | 1.24% | 2.60% | 1.90% | 2.05% | 1.77% | 1.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GMOM and DVOL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GMOM has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to DVOL (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMOM dropped -25.03% vs DVOL's -38.26%.
On 5-year performance, GMOM leads with 7.01% vs 6.82% for DVOL. On fees, DVOL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, DVOL has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GMOM has performed better with a 7.01% return vs 6.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DVOL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for GMOM.
GMOM has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.68% for DVOL.
They also come from different issuers: Cambria and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for GMOM and 0.60% for DVOL.
GMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GMOM and DVOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer