GMOI vs. DRES

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

GMOI (GMO International Value ETF) and DRES (GMO Domestic Resilience ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GMOI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Value, while DRES is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by GMO. GMOI is passively managed, while DRES is actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GMOI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DRES.

Performance

GMOI vs. DRES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO International Value ETF (GMOI) and GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMOI achieves a 16.01% return, which is significantly lower than DRES's 21.80% return.

GMOI

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 1.29%
• 6M: 12.66%
• YTD: 16.01%
• 1Y: 37.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRES

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: 0.14%
• 6M: 12.22%
• YTD: 21.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMOI vs. DRES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GMOI GMO International Value ETF	16.01%	9.27%
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF	21.80%	2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between GMOI and DRES is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025	0.59

Return for Risk

GMOI vs. DRES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMOI

GMOI Risk / Return Rank: 93
GMOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
GMOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
GMOI Omega Ratio Rank: 92
GMOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
GMOI Martin Ratio Rank: 92

DRES

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMOI vs. DRES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO International Value ETF (GMOI) and GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GMOI	DRES	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.82	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.91	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.49	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.52	—	—

Drawdowns

GMOI vs. DRES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMOI drawdown since its inception was -14.67%, which is greater than DRES's maximum drawdown of -10.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOI and DRES.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMOI	DRES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.67%	-10.41%	-4.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	-1.43%	+1.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.67%	-2.18%	+0.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GMOI	DRES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.29%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.86%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.31%	18.22%	-4.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.41%	18.22%	-2.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.41%	18.22%	-2.81%

GMOI vs. DRES - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMOI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DRES's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

GMOI vs. DRES - Dividend Comparison

GMOI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than DRES's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF	0.52%	0.22%	0.00%
GMOI GMO International Value ETF	2.76%	2.74%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMOI and DRES in my portfolio?

GMOI and DRES have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GMOI or DRES?

On fees, DRES is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GMOI or DRES?

DRES is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GMOI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GMOI or DRES?

GMOI has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 0.52% for DRES.

What is the main difference between GMOI and DRES?

GMOI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DRES is Mid Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GMOI and 0.50% for DRES.