GMOI vs. DRES
GMOI (GMO International Value ETF) and DRES (GMO Domestic Resilience ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GMOI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Value, while DRES is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by GMO. GMOI is passively managed, while DRES is actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GMOI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DRES.
Performance
GMOI vs. DRES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMOI achieves a 13.97% return, which is significantly lower than DRES's 20.81% return.
GMOI
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 13.97%
- 6M
- 17.28%
- 1Y
- 37.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRES
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 20.81%
- 6M
- 18.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GMOI vs. DRES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GMOI GMO International Value ETF | 13.97% | 8.46% |
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF | 20.81% | 2.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMOI and DRES is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMOI vs. DRES — Risk / Return Rank
GMOI
DRES
GMOI vs. DRES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO International Value ETF (GMOI) and GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMOI | DRES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.89 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMOI | DRES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.17 | 2.07 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
GMOI vs. DRES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMOI drawdown since its inception was -14.67%, which is greater than DRES's maximum drawdown of -10.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOI and DRES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMOI | DRES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.67% | -10.41% | -4.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | 0.00% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.70% | -2.31% | +0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | — | — |
Volatility
GMOI vs. DRES - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMOI | DRES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.29% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.15% | 18.32% | -5.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 18.32% | -2.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 18.32% | -2.74% |
GMOI vs. DRES - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMOI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DRES's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GMOI vs. DRES - Dividend Comparison
GMOI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, more than DRES's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF | 0.30% | 0.22% | 0.00% |
GMOI GMO International Value ETF | 2.40% | 2.74% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GMOI and DRES have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRES is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRES is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GMOI.
GMOI has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 0.30% for DRES.
GMOI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DRES is Mid Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GMOI and 0.50% for DRES.
Find the right allocation for GMOI and DRES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer