GMOD vs. LOTI
GMOD (GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF) and LOTI (Liberty One Tactical Income ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GMOD charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for LOTI.
Performance
GMOD vs. LOTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMOD achieves a 5.74% return, which is significantly higher than LOTI's 3.22% return.
GMOD
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- YTD
- 5.74%
- 6M
- 6.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LOTI
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 3.22%
- 6M
- 3.19%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GMOD vs. LOTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF | 5.74% | 3.87% |
LOTI Liberty One Tactical Income ETF | 3.22% | -0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMOD and LOTI is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMOD vs. LOTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD) and Liberty One Tactical Income ETF (LOTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMOD | LOTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.77 | 0.97 | +0.80 |
Drawdowns
GMOD vs. LOTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMOD drawdown since its inception was -6.50%, which is greater than LOTI's maximum drawdown of -4.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOD and LOTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMOD | LOTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -4.42% | -2.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -1.97% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.16% | -1.35% | +0.19% |
Volatility
GMOD vs. LOTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMOD | LOTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.95% | 5.66% | +3.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.95% | 5.66% | +3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.95% | 5.66% | +3.29% |
GMOD vs. LOTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMOD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than LOTI's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
GMOD vs. LOTI - Dividend Comparison
GMOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than LOTI's 1.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF | 0.88% | 0.93% |
LOTI Liberty One Tactical Income ETF | 1.33% | 0.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GMOD and LOTI have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GMOD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GMOD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for LOTI.
LOTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.88% for GMOD.
They also come from different issuers: GMO and Liberty One. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GMOD and 1.01% for LOTI.
Find the right allocation for GMOD and LOTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer