PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMOD vs. GMMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMOD vs. GMMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD) and GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF (GMMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMOD achieves a 5.74% return, which is significantly higher than GMMA's 2.18% return.


GMOD

1D
-1.79%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
5.74%
6M
6.83%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GMMA

1D
-1.65%
1M
0.52%
YTD
2.18%
6M
2.21%
1Y
9.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMOD vs. GMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GMOD
GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF
5.74%3.87%
GMMA
GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF
2.18%1.39%

Correlation

The correlation between GMOD and GMMA is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025

0.73

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMOD vs. GMMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMOD

GMMA
GMMA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
GMMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMMA Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
GMMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMMA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMOD vs. GMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD) and GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF (GMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GMOD vs. GMMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMODGMMADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.77

0.94

+0.83

Drawdowns

GMOD vs. GMMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMOD drawdown since its inception was -6.50%, which is greater than GMMA's maximum drawdown of -5.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOD and GMMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMODGMMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.50%

-5.21%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-1.79%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.16%

-1.23%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

Volatility

GMOD vs. GMMA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMODGMMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.95%

5.58%

+3.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.95%

7.20%

+1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.95%

7.20%

+1.75%

GMOD vs. GMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMOD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GMMA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMOD vs. GMMA - Dividend Comparison

GMOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than GMMA's 3.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
GMMA
GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF
3.70%3.00%0.57%
GMOD
GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF
0.88%0.93%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMOD and GMMA have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GMOD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GMOD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GMMA.

GMMA has the higher dividend yield at 3.70%, compared with 0.88% for GMOD.

They also come from different issuers: GMO and GammaRoad Capital Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GMOD and 0.75% for GMMA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMOD and GMMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer