GMOD vs. GMMA
GMOD (GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF) and GMMA (GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. GMOD is actively managed, while GMMA is passively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GMOD charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GMMA.
Performance
GMOD vs. GMMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMOD achieves a 6.85% return, which is significantly higher than GMMA's 1.79% return.
GMOD
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- 6.85%
- 6M
- 6.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GMMA
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- 1Y
- 7.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GMOD vs. GMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF | 6.85% | 4.35% |
GMMA GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF | 1.79% | 1.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMOD and GMMA is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMOD vs. GMMA — Risk / Return Rank
GMOD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GMMA
GMOD vs. GMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD) and GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF (GMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GMOD | GMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.24 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.13 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GMOD vs. GMMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMOD drawdown since its inception was -6.50%, which is greater than GMMA's maximum drawdown of -5.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOD and GMMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMOD | GMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -5.21% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -2.15% | +1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.13% | -1.24% | +0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.06% | — |
Volatility
GMOD vs. GMMA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMOD | GMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.02% | 6.03% | +2.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.02% | 7.32% | +1.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.02% | 7.32% | +1.70% |
GMOD vs. GMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMOD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GMMA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GMOD vs. GMMA - Dividend Comparison
GMOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than GMMA's 3.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GMMA GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF | 3.71% | 3.00% | 0.57% |
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF | 0.87% | 0.93% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GMOD and GMMA have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GMOD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GMOD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GMMA.
GMMA has the higher dividend yield at 3.71%, compared with 0.87% for GMOD.
They also come from different issuers: GMO and GammaRoad Capital Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GMOD and 0.75% for GMMA.
Find the right allocation for GMOD and GMMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer