PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMOD vs. EZRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMOD vs. EZRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD) and AlphaDroid Defensive Sector Rotation ETF (EZRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMOD achieves a 7.50% return, which is significantly higher than EZRO's -2.07% return.


GMOD

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.29%
6M
5.04%
YTD
7.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EZRO

1D
-2.64%
1M
-5.59%
6M
-5.47%
YTD
-2.07%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMOD vs. EZRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GMOD
GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF
7.50%3.23%
EZRO
AlphaDroid Defensive Sector Rotation ETF
-2.07%-3.19%

Correlation

The correlation between GMOD and EZRO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMOD vs. EZRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD) and AlphaDroid Defensive Sector Rotation ETF (EZRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GMOD vs. EZRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMOD vs. EZRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMOD drawdown since its inception was -6.50%, smaller than the maximum EZRO drawdown of -13.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOD and EZRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMODEZRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.50%

-13.07%

+6.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-13.07%

+12.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.09%

-4.45%

+3.36%

Volatility

GMOD vs. EZRO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMODEZRODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.83%

21.69%

-12.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.83%

21.69%

-12.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.83%

21.69%

-12.86%

GMOD vs. EZRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMOD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EZRO's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMOD vs. EZRO - Dividend Comparison

GMOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, while EZRO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


GMOD and EZRO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GMOD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GMOD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for EZRO.

GMOD has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.00% for EZRO.

They also come from different issuers: GMO and AlphaDroid. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GMOD and 1.01% for EZRO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMOD and EZRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer