PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMOD vs. CORO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMOD vs. CORO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD) and iShares International Country Rotation Active ETF (CORO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMOD achieves a 6.85% return, which is significantly lower than CORO's 16.20% return.


GMOD

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
6.85%
6M
6.58%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CORO

1D
-0.77%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
16.20%
6M
15.70%
1Y
32.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMOD vs. CORO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GMOD and CORO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025

0.92

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMOD vs. CORO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMOD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


CORO
CORO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CORO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CORO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CORO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CORO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CORO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMOD vs. CORO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD) and iShares International Country Rotation Active ETF (CORO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GMODCORODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.21

GMOD vs. CORO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMOD vs. CORO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMOD drawdown since its inception was -6.50%, smaller than the maximum CORO drawdown of -14.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOD and CORO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMODCORODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.50%

-14.13%

+7.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-3.24%

+2.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.13%

-1.76%

+0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

Volatility

GMOD vs. CORO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMODCORODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.02%

16.72%

-7.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.02%

17.25%

-8.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.02%

17.25%

-8.23%

GMOD vs. CORO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMOD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CORO's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMOD vs. CORO - Dividend Comparison

GMOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than CORO's 2.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CORO
iShares International Country Rotation Active ETF
2.76%3.20%1.53%
GMOD
GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF
0.87%0.93%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, GMOD and CORO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, GMOD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GMOD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CORO.

CORO has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 0.87% for GMOD.

They also come from different issuers: GMO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GMOD and 0.55% for CORO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMOD and CORO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer