PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMLVX vs. GSIYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMLVX vs. GSIYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund (GMLVX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6 (GSIYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMLVX achieves a 16.84% return, which is significantly higher than GSIYX's 8.15% return.


GMLVX

1D
4.11%
1M
-2.22%
6M
6.50%
YTD
16.84%
1Y
33.55%
3Y*
17.86%
5Y*
7.22%
10Y*
8.41%
ALL TIME*
4.47%

GSIYX

1D
0.62%
1M
2.02%
6M
4.43%
YTD
8.15%
1Y
15.65%
3Y*
15.48%
5Y*
9.23%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GMLVX vs. GSIYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMLVX
GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund
16.84%30.29%7.90%11.13%-20.58%-0.51%15.41%17.72%-15.18%38.23%
GSIYX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6
8.15%20.89%9.69%22.07%-10.99%12.47%15.86%27.59%-6.02%29.91%

Correlation

The correlation between GMLVX and GSIYX is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between GMLVX and GSIYX has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMLVX vs. GSIYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GMLVX
GMLVX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GMLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
GMLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIYX
GSIYX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
GSIYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GMLVX vs. GSIYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund (GMLVX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6 (GSIYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GMLVXGSIYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.29

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

2.01

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.58

5.51

+1.07

GMLVX vs. GSIYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMLVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the GSIYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMLVX and GSIYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMLVX vs. GSIYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMLVX drawdown since its inception was -70.50%, which is greater than GSIYX's maximum drawdown of -28.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMLVX and GSIYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMLVXGSIYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.50%

-28.79%

-41.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.40%

-7.81%

-6.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.31%

-10.30%

-6.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.48%

-25.36%

-8.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.87%

-2.17%

-8.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.10%

-4.80%

-13.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.67%

2.85%

+1.82%

Volatility

GMLVX vs. GSIYX - Volatility Comparison

GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund (GMLVX) has a higher volatility of 10.09% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6 (GSIYX) at 2.75%. This indicates that GMLVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMLVXGSIYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.09%

2.75%

+7.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.08%

8.20%

+13.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.91%

9.88%

+14.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.77%

14.27%

+3.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.13%

15.62%

+2.51%

GMLVX vs. GSIYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMLVX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIYX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMLVX vs. GSIYX - Dividend Comparison

GMLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than GSIYX's 4.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMLVX
GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund
1.28%1.50%3.01%3.46%17.44%9.65%0.19%1.76%15.38%0.71%0.35%1.34%
GSIYX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6
4.76%5.14%11.21%2.38%4.91%2.25%0.19%0.67%0.55%0.16%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMLVX and GSIYX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMLVX has higher volatility (10.09%) compared to GSIYX (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMLVX dropped -70.50% vs GSIYX's -28.79%.

GSIYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMLVX and GSIYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer