GMLVX vs. FGKPX
GMLVX (GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund) and FGKPX (Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GMLVX returned 7.22%/yr vs 7.21%/yr for FGKPX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GMLVX charges 1.40%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for FGKPX.
Performance
GMLVX vs. FGKPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMLVX achieves a 16.84% return, which is significantly higher than FGKPX's 12.75% return.
GMLVX
- 1D
- 4.11%
- 1M
- -2.22%
- 6M
- 6.50%
- YTD
- 16.84%
- 1Y
- 33.55%
- 3Y*
- 17.86%
- 5Y*
- 7.22%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.47%
FGKPX
- 1D
- 2.12%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- 6M
- 9.98%
- YTD
- 12.75%
- 1Y
- 16.85%
- 3Y*
- 11.36%
- 5Y*
- 7.21%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
GMLVX vs. FGKPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMLVX GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund | 16.84% | 30.29% | 7.90% | 11.13% | -20.58% | -0.51% | 15.41% | 8.26% |
FGKPX Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund | 12.75% | 12.56% | 5.96% | 15.28% | -12.98% | 10.75% | 5.22% | 3.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMLVX and FGKPX is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2019 | 0.87 |
The correlation between GMLVX and FGKPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMLVX vs. FGKPX — Risk / Return Rank
GMLVX
FGKPX
GMLVX vs. FGKPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund (GMLVX) and Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund (FGKPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GMLVX | FGKPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.26 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 2.26 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.58 | 5.82 | +0.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GMLVX vs. FGKPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMLVX drawdown since its inception was -70.50%, which is greater than FGKPX's maximum drawdown of -32.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMLVX and FGKPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMLVX | FGKPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.50% | -32.05% | -38.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.40% | -6.93% | -7.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.31% | -12.67% | -3.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.48% | -20.69% | -12.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.87% | -4.34% | -6.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.10% | -5.28% | -12.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.67% | 2.68% | +1.99% |
Volatility
GMLVX vs. FGKPX - Volatility Comparison
GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund (GMLVX) has a higher volatility of 10.09% compared to Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund (FGKPX) at 4.68%. This indicates that GMLVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGKPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMLVX | FGKPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.09% | 4.68% | +5.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.08% | 10.84% | +11.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.91% | 11.80% | +12.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.77% | 10.62% | +7.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.13% | 12.66% | +5.47% |
GMLVX vs. FGKPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMLVX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FGKPX's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
GMLVX vs. FGKPX - Dividend Comparison
GMLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than FGKPX's 6.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGKPX Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund | 6.87% | 7.75% | 5.07% | 2.91% | 1.88% | 2.30% | 1.77% | 1.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GMLVX GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund | 1.28% | 1.50% | 3.01% | 3.46% | 17.44% | 9.65% | 0.19% | 1.76% | 15.38% | 0.71% | 0.35% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GMLVX and FGKPX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GMLVX has higher volatility (10.09%) compared to FGKPX (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMLVX dropped -70.50% vs FGKPX's -32.05%.
FGKPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GMLVX and FGKPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer