GMGEX vs. GAPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund (GAPIX).
GMGEX is managed by GMO. It was launched on Nov 25, 1996. GAPIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jan 1, 1998.
Performance
GMGEX vs. GAPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GMGEX vs. GAPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMGEX GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund | 4.96% | 29.14% | 4.12% | 22.27% | -17.07% | 14.99% | 9.55% | 25.45% | -13.04% | 26.39% |
GAPIX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund | -1.21% | 21.72% | 24.35% | 20.67% | -18.97% | 20.53% | 13.61% | 31.78% | -11.06% | 26.49% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMGEX achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly higher than GAPIX's -1.21% return. Over the past 10 years, GMGEX has underperformed GAPIX with an annualized return of 10.06%, while GAPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.31% annualized return.
GMGEX
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- 4.96%
- 6M
- 11.38%
- 1Y
- 31.11%
- 3Y*
- 17.44%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 10.06%
GAPIX
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- -1.21%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 20.97%
- 3Y*
- 18.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GMGEX vs. GAPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMGEX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than GAPIX's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
GMGEX vs. GAPIX — Risk / Return Rank
GMGEX
GAPIX
GMGEX vs. GAPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund (GAPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMGEX | GAPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.02 | 1.21 | +0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.72 | 1.74 | +0.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.27 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 1.69 | +1.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.89 | 7.86 | +4.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMGEX | GAPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 1.21 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.62 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.69 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.40 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between GMGEX and GAPIX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GMGEX vs. GAPIX - Dividend Comparison
GMGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than GAPIX's 14.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMGEX GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund | 4.46% | 4.69% | 0.29% | 5.62% | 7.81% | 7.76% | 3.83% | 3.14% | 3.14% | 2.90% | 3.71% | 4.20% |
GAPIX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund | 14.66% | 14.49% | 14.79% | 5.27% | 6.66% | 12.60% | 2.64% | 10.09% | 2.88% | 2.33% | 1.56% | 1.39% |
Drawdowns
GMGEX vs. GAPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMGEX drawdown since its inception was -58.47%, roughly equal to the maximum GAPIX drawdown of -58.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMGEX and GAPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMGEX | GAPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.47% | -58.36% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.24% | -10.22% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.58% | -31.13% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.98% | -36.31% | +1.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.70% | -6.54% | +0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.84% | -11.43% | -5.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 2.85% | -0.17% |
Volatility
GMGEX vs. GAPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX) is 5.74%, while Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund (GAPIX) has a volatility of 6.31%. This indicates that GMGEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GMGEX | GAPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.74% | 6.31% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.83% | 10.33% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.75% | 18.25% | -2.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 17.02% | -2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 17.98% | -1.96% |