GMGEX vs. CWS

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GMGEX (GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund) and CWS (AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF) are both funds - GMGEX is a Global Equities fund managed by GMO, while CWS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Over the past 5 years, GMGEX returned 9.87%/yr vs 8.33%/yr for CWS. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GMGEX charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for CWS.

Performance

GMGEX vs. CWS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX) and AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMGEX achieves a 19.07% return, which is significantly higher than CWS's -1.78% return.

GMGEX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 6.47%
• YTD: 19.07%
• 6M: 21.73%
• 1Y: 41.45%
• 3Y*: 21.71%
• 5Y*: 9.87%
• 10Y*: 11.26%

CWS

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -0.93%
• YTD: -1.78%
• 6M: -1.09%
• 1Y: -0.36%
• 3Y*: 10.26%
• 5Y*: 8.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMGEX vs. CWS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GMGEX GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund	19.07%	29.14%	4.12%	22.27%	-17.07%	14.99%	9.55%	25.45%	-13.04%	26.39%
CWS AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF	-1.78%	6.43%	9.82%	25.06%	-10.42%	22.20%	17.12%	30.97%	-6.46%	20.92%

Correlation

The correlation between GMGEX and CWS is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016	0.68

The correlation between GMGEX and CWS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GMGEX vs. CWS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMGEX

GMGEX Risk / Return Rank: 91
GMGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
GMGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
GMGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
GMGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
GMGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

CWS

CWS Risk / Return Rank: 8
CWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
CWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
CWS Omega Ratio Rank: 8
CWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
CWS Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMGEX vs. CWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX) and AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GMGEX	CWS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.36	-0.03	+3.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.58	0.06	+4.53
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.62	1.01	+0.61
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.56	-0.09	+4.65
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.14	-0.23	+18.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GMGEX vs. CWS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMGEX Sharpe Ratio is 3.36, which is higher than the CWS Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMGEX and CWS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GMGEX	CWS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.36	-0.03	+3.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.54	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.67	-0.42

Drawdowns

GMGEX vs. CWS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMGEX drawdown since its inception was -58.47%, which is greater than CWS's maximum drawdown of -33.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMGEX and CWS.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMGEX	CWS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.47%	-33.82%	-24.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.24%	-11.92%	+2.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.12%	-16.56%	-0.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.58%	-24.87%	-3.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-6.19%	+6.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.75%	-4.54%	-12.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.32%	4.59%	-2.27%

Volatility

GMGEX vs. CWS - Volatility Comparison

GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) at 3.32%. This indicates that GMGEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GMGEX	CWS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.06%	3.32%	+0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.90%	10.34%	-0.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.66%	13.30%	-0.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.80%	15.66%	-0.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.06%	16.92%	-0.86%

GMGEX vs. CWS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMGEX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than CWS's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

GMGEX vs. CWS - Dividend Comparison

GMGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than CWS's 0.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CWS AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF	0.31%	0.31%	0.59%	0.25%	0.50%	0.16%	0.27%	0.39%	2.07%	0.29%	0.03%	0.00%
GMGEX GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund	3.93%	4.69%	0.29%	5.62%	7.81%	7.76%	3.83%	3.14%	3.14%	2.90%	3.71%	4.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMGEX and CWS in my portfolio?

GMGEX and CWS have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GMGEX or CWS?

GMGEX has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to CWS (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMGEX dropped -58.47% vs CWS's -33.82%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMGEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.