GMGEX vs. GABFX
GMGEX (GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund) and GABFX (GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - GMGEX is a Global Equities fund managed by GMO, while GABFX is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund managed by GMO. Over the past 10 years, GMGEX returned 11.46%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GABFX. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GMGEX charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for GABFX.
Performance
GMGEX vs. GABFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMGEX achieves a 16.28% return, which is significantly higher than GABFX's -3.48% return. Over the past 10 years, GMGEX has outperformed GABFX with an annualized return of 11.46%, while GABFX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.51% annualized return.
GMGEX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- YTD
- 16.28%
- 6M
- 15.49%
- 1Y
- 35.95%
- 3Y*
- 20.30%
- 5Y*
- 9.62%
- 10Y*
- 11.46%
GABFX
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- -3.48%
- 6M
- -3.69%
- 1Y
- -0.23%
- 3Y*
- -1.26%
- 5Y*
- -3.20%
- 10Y*
- 0.51%
GMGEX vs. GABFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMGEX GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund | 16.28% | 29.14% | 4.12% | 22.27% | -17.07% | 14.99% | 9.55% | 25.45% | -13.04% | 26.39% |
GABFX GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund | -3.48% | 8.82% | -12.60% | 8.33% | -14.86% | 1.34% | 11.28% | 8.00% | 0.78% | 2.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMGEX and GABFX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2009 | 0.02 |
Over the past year, GMGEX and GABFX have become more correlated (0.26) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMGEX vs. GABFX — Risk / Return Rank
GMGEX
GABFX
GMGEX vs. GABFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX) and GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund (GABFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GMGEX | GABFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.00 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.86 | -0.02 | +3.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.01 | -0.06 | +15.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GMGEX vs. GABFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMGEX drawdown since its inception was -58.47%, which is greater than GABFX's maximum drawdown of -27.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMGEX and GABFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMGEX | GABFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.47% | -27.84% | -30.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.24% | -9.58% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.12% | -19.48% | +2.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.58% | -27.84% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.98% | -27.84% | -7.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.98% | -17.38% | +14.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.72% | -7.34% | -9.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 3.97% | -1.60% |
Volatility
GMGEX vs. GABFX - Volatility Comparison
GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund (GABFX) at 2.57%. This indicates that GMGEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GABFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMGEX | GABFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.16% | 2.57% | +2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.86% | 6.68% | +4.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.37% | 10.23% | +3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 14.04% | +0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 10.37% | +5.63% |
GMGEX vs. GABFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMGEX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than GABFX's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
GMGEX vs. GABFX - Dividend Comparison
GMGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, more than GABFX's 2.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABFX GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund | 2.79% | 2.69% | 4.19% | 5.03% | 0.71% | 1.81% | 1.20% | 4.72% | 5.13% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 7.43% |
GMGEX GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund | 4.03% | 4.69% | 0.29% | 5.62% | 7.81% | 7.76% | 3.83% | 3.14% | 3.14% | 2.90% | 3.71% | 4.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GMGEX and GABFX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GMGEX has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to GABFX (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMGEX dropped -58.47% vs GABFX's -27.84%.
GMGEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GMGEX and GABFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer