PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GABFX vs. XLF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GABFX and XLF is -0.10. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


-0.50.00.51.0-0.1

Performance

GABFX vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund (GABFX) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-10.32%
15.13%
GABFX
XLF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GABFX:

-0.09

XLF:

2.09

Sortino Ratio

GABFX:

-0.01

XLF:

2.99

Omega Ratio

GABFX:

1.00

XLF:

1.38

Calmar Ratio

GABFX:

-0.07

XLF:

4.09

Martin Ratio

GABFX:

-0.17

XLF:

12.07

Ulcer Index

GABFX:

9.19%

XLF:

2.52%

Daily Std Dev

GABFX:

17.02%

XLF:

14.59%

Max Drawdown

GABFX:

-27.84%

XLF:

-82.43%

Current Drawdown

GABFX:

-18.23%

XLF:

-2.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GABFX achieves a 3.01% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's 5.01% return. Over the past 10 years, GABFX has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of -0.53%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 14.42% annualized return.


GABFX

YTD

3.01%

1M

3.65%

6M

-10.32%

1Y

-0.78%

5Y*

-1.59%

10Y*

-0.53%

XLF

YTD

5.01%

1M

0.67%

6M

15.13%

1Y

28.55%

5Y*

12.75%

10Y*

14.42%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GABFX vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GABFX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.13% expense ratio.


GABFX
GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund
Expense ratio chart for GABFX: current value at 0.32% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.32%
Expense ratio chart for XLF: current value at 0.13% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.13%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GABFX vs. XLF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GABFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GABFX is 55
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GABFX is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GABFX is 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GABFX is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GABFX is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GABFX is 66
Martin Ratio Rank

XLF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLF is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLF is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLF is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLF is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLF is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLF is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GABFX vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund (GABFX) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GABFX, currently valued at -0.09, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.092.09
The chart of Sortino ratio for GABFX, currently valued at -0.01, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00-0.012.99
The chart of Omega ratio for GABFX, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.001.38
The chart of Calmar ratio for GABFX, currently valued at -0.07, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.00-0.074.09
The chart of Martin ratio for GABFX, currently valued at -0.17, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00-0.1712.07
GABFX
XLF

The current GABFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GABFX and XLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.09
2.09
GABFX
XLF

Dividends

GABFX vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

GABFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, more than XLF's 1.35% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GABFX
GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund
5.01%5.16%5.03%0.72%1.81%1.21%4.72%5.13%1.08%0.00%7.43%2.78%
XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.35%1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.86%2.09%1.48%1.63%2.40%1.98%

Drawdowns

GABFX vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GABFX drawdown since its inception was -27.84%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABFX and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-18.23%
-2.76%
GABFX
XLF

Volatility

GABFX vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund (GABFX) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) at 3.39%. This indicates that GABFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.93%
3.39%
GABFX
XLF
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab