GMF vs. XLK

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK).

GMF and XLK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GMF is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Asia Pacific Emerging BMI Index. It was launched on Mar 19, 2007. XLK is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both GMF and XLK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

GMF vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GMF vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GMF SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF	-1.51%	21.99%	16.55%	8.20%	-18.99%	-1.93%	24.96%	19.92%	-14.25%	41.71%
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	-6.18%	24.61%	21.63%	56.02%	-27.73%	34.74%	43.62%	49.86%	-1.68%	34.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMF achieves a -1.51% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's -6.18% return. Over the past 10 years, GMF has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 8.58%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 21.00% annualized return.

GMF

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: -6.80%
• YTD: -1.51%
• 6M: -1.80%
• 1Y: 19.86%
• 3Y*: 13.18%
• 5Y*: 2.83%
• 10Y*: 8.58%

XLK

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: -3.20%
• YTD: -6.18%
• 6M: -4.94%
• 1Y: 30.47%
• 3Y*: 22.19%
• 5Y*: 15.65%
• 10Y*: 21.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMF vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.

GMF

SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF

XLK

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

Return for Risk

GMF vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMF

GMF Risk / Return Rank: 57
GMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
GMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
GMF Omega Ratio Rank: 56
GMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
GMF Martin Ratio Rank: 55

XLK

XLK Risk / Return Rank: 65
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 63
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMF vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GMF	XLK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	1.13	-0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	1.71	-0.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.24	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	1.97	-0.44
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.75	6.31	-0.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GMF vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMF Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMF and XLK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GMF	XLK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.08	1.13	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15	0.64	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	0.87	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.36	-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between GMF and XLK is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

GMF vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

GMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than XLK's 0.57% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GMF SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF	1.51%	1.49%	1.92%	2.75%	2.54%	2.71%	1.32%	1.75%	2.26%	1.70%	2.49%	3.76%
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	0.57%	0.54%	0.66%	0.76%	1.04%	0.65%	0.92%	1.16%	1.60%	1.37%	1.74%	1.79%

Drawdowns

GMF vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMF drawdown since its inception was -67.18%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMF and XLK.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMF	XLK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.18%	-82.05%	+14.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.03%	-15.92%	+2.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.10%	-33.56%	-2.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.18%	-33.56%	-6.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.81%	-11.04%	+1.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.72%	-35.17%	+18.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.48%	4.98%	-1.50%

Volatility

GMF vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) is 6.79%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 8.12%. This indicates that GMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GMF	XLK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.79%	8.12%	-1.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.55%	16.49%	-3.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.54%	27.05%	-8.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.36%	24.72%	-6.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.12%	24.33%	-5.21%