GMF vs. EWH
GMF (SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF) and EWH (iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - GMF tracks the S&P Asia Pacific Emerging BMI Index while EWH tracks the MSCI Hong Kong Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GMF returned 10.11%/yr vs 4.68%/yr for EWH. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.
Performance
GMF vs. EWH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMF achieves a 13.96% return, which is significantly higher than EWH's 5.98% return. Over the past 10 years, GMF has outperformed EWH with an annualized return of 10.11%, while EWH has yielded a comparatively lower 4.68% annualized return.
GMF
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 4.32%
- YTD
- 13.96%
- 6M
- 14.78%
- 1Y
- 31.46%
- 3Y*
- 19.48%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- 10.11%
EWH
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- -5.02%
- YTD
- 5.98%
- 6M
- 5.27%
- 1Y
- 22.22%
- 3Y*
- 9.34%
- 5Y*
- -0.21%
- 10Y*
- 4.68%
GMF vs. EWH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMF SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF | 13.96% | 21.99% | 16.55% | 8.20% | -18.99% | -1.93% | 24.96% | 19.92% | -14.25% | 41.71% |
EWH iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF | 5.98% | 34.50% | 0.00% | -13.87% | -6.81% | -3.49% | 4.17% | 10.74% | -8.76% | 36.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMF and EWH is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2007 | 0.78 |
The correlation between GMF and EWH shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GMF vs. EWH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GMF
EWH
Technology
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
GMF
EWH
-
Financial Services
GMF
EWH
Consumer Cyclical
GMF
EWH
Communication Services
GMF
EWH
Industrials
GMF
EWH
Basic Materials
GMF
EWH
-
Healthcare
GMF
EWH
-
Consumer Defensive
GMF
EWH
Energy
GMF
EWH
-
Utilities
GMF
EWH
Real Estate
GMF
EWH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMF vs. EWH — Risk / Return Rank
GMF
EWH
GMF vs. EWH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) and iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMF | EWH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.24 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 2.70 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.27 | 7.10 | +2.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMF | EWH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 1.37 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | -0.01 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.24 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.18 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
GMF vs. EWH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMF drawdown since its inception was -67.18%, roughly equal to the maximum EWH drawdown of -66.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMF and EWH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMF | EWH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.18% | -66.44% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.62% | -8.27% | -4.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.43% | -24.93% | +3.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.76% | -41.46% | +5.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.18% | -42.71% | +2.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -8.27% | +7.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.59% | -19.48% | +2.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 3.14% | +0.26% |
Volatility
GMF vs. EWH - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) at 4.94%. This indicates that GMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMF | EWH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 4.94% | +1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.65% | 11.78% | +1.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.50% | 16.29% | +0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.52% | 20.00% | -1.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.19% | 19.56% | -0.37% |
GMF vs. EWH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GMF and EWH have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Dividends
GMF vs. EWH - Dividend Comparison
GMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than EWH's 4.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWH iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF | 4.90% | 5.20% | 4.17% | 4.28% | 2.91% | 2.78% | 2.56% | 2.71% | 2.93% | 4.35% | 3.08% | 2.63% |
GMF SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF | 1.31% | 1.49% | 1.92% | 2.75% | 2.54% | 2.71% | 1.32% | 1.75% | 2.26% | 1.70% | 2.49% | 3.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GMF and EWH have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GMF has higher volatility (6.11%) compared to EWH (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMF dropped -67.18% vs EWH's -66.44%.
On 10-year performance, GMF leads with 10.11% vs 4.68% for EWH. Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. On volatility, EWH has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GMF has performed better with a 10.11% return vs 4.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GMF and EWH have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.
EWH has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 1.31% for GMF.
GMF tracks S&P Asia Pacific Emerging BMI Index, while EWH tracks MSCI Hong Kong Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.
GMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GMF and EWH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer