PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMEY vs. EIPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMEY vs. EIPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax GME Option Income Strategy ETF (GMEY) and FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMEY achieves a -8.59% return, which is significantly lower than EIPI's 15.54% return.


GMEY

1D
-0.56%
1M
-13.24%
6M
-19.18%
YTD
-8.59%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

EIPI

1D
-1.03%
1M
1.95%
6M
7.48%
YTD
15.54%
1Y
19.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.35M$2.85M$2.19M
$32.88K$35.63K$44.01K

GMEY vs. EIPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GMEY and EIPI is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2025

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMEY vs. EIPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GMEY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


EIPI
EIPI Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
EIPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIPI Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EIPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIPI Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GMEY vs. EIPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax GME Option Income Strategy ETF (GMEY) and FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GMEYEIPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.08

GMEY vs. EIPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMEY vs. EIPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMEY drawdown since its inception was -31.17%, which is greater than EIPI's maximum drawdown of -12.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMEY and EIPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMEYEIPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.17%

-12.33%

-18.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.02%

-2.52%

-28.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.65%

-1.70%

-15.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

Volatility

GMEY vs. EIPI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMEYEIPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.60%

10.13%

+19.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.60%

13.00%

+16.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.60%

13.00%

+16.60%

GMEY vs. EIPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMEY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than EIPI's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMEY vs. EIPI - Dividend Comparison

GMEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 70.28%, more than EIPI's 6.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
EIPI
FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF
6.80%9.71%6.31%
GMEY
YieldMax GME Option Income Strategy ETF
70.28%21.84%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMEY and EIPI have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GMEY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GMEY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.11% for EIPI.

GMEY has the higher dividend yield at 70.28%, compared with 6.80% for EIPI.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GMEY and 1.11% for EIPI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMEY and EIPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer