GMCOX vs. MCDWX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund (GMCOX) and Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX).
GMCOX is managed by GuideMark. It was launched on Jun 29, 2001. MCDWX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Apr 15, 2020.
Performance
GMCOX vs. MCDWX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GMCOX vs. MCDWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMCOX GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund | -0.36% | 6.56% | 1.39% | 6.19% | -14.64% | -2.01% | 4.23% |
MCDWX Manning & Napier Credit Series | -0.13% | 7.57% | 4.13% | 7.31% | -11.13% | 0.01% | 8.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMCOX achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly lower than MCDWX's -0.13% return.
GMCOX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- 3.20%
- 3Y*
- 3.47%
- 5Y*
- -0.27%
- 10Y*
- 1.24%
MCDWX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 0.99%
- 1Y
- 4.63%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- 1.72%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GMCOX vs. MCDWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMCOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MCDWX's 0.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GMCOX vs. MCDWX — Risk / Return Rank
GMCOX
MCDWX
GMCOX vs. MCDWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund (GMCOX) and Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMCOX | MCDWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 1.51 | -0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.24 | 2.12 | -0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.30 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 2.26 | -0.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.73 | 8.14 | -4.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMCOX | MCDWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 1.51 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.37 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.58 | -0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between GMCOX and MCDWX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GMCOX vs. MCDWX - Dividend Comparison
GMCOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than MCDWX's 4.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMCOX GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund | 3.54% | 3.54% | 3.39% | 3.40% | 2.27% | 2.16% | 3.49% | 1.45% | 2.38% | 2.35% | 2.29% | 2.55% |
MCDWX Manning & Napier Credit Series | 4.43% | 4.83% | 4.41% | 4.48% | 3.25% | 4.45% | 2.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GMCOX vs. MCDWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMCOX drawdown since its inception was -28.49%, which is greater than MCDWX's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMCOX and MCDWX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMCOX | MCDWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.49% | -15.96% | -12.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.89% | -2.20% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.75% | -15.96% | -3.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.61% | -1.63% | -2.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.83% | -4.24% | -3.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 0.61% | +0.42% |
Volatility
GMCOX vs. MCDWX - Volatility Comparison
GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund (GMCOX) has a higher volatility of 1.59% compared to Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX) at 1.42%. This indicates that GMCOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCDWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GMCOX | MCDWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.59% | 1.42% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.60% | 2.00% | +0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.39% | 3.31% | +1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.92% | 4.62% | +1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.97% | 4.41% | +0.56% |