GM vs. BABA
GM (General Motors Company) and BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — GM in Auto Manufacturers, BABA in Internet Retail. Over the past 10 years, GM returned 13.16%/yr vs 4.42%/yr for BABA. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GM vs. BABA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GM achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly higher than BABA's -22.32% return. Over the past 10 years, GM has outperformed BABA with an annualized return of 13.16%, while BABA has yielded a comparatively lower 4.42% annualized return.
GM
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 7.74%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- 66.96%
- 3Y*
- 30.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 13.16%
BABA
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -21.91%
- YTD
- -22.32%
- 6M
- -26.87%
- 1Y
- -2.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- -10.74%
- 10Y*
- 4.42%
GM vs. BABA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GM General Motors Company | 0.68% | 54.24% | 49.84% | 7.92% | -42.36% | 40.80% | 15.16% | 14.02% | -15.06% | 22.51% |
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | -22.32% | 75.80% | 11.77% | -10.83% | -25.84% | -48.96% | 9.73% | 54.74% | -20.51% | 96.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between GM and BABA is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2014 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
GM:
$74.93B
BABA:
$272.45B
GM:
$2.68
BABA:
CN¥33.90
GM:
30.41
BABA:
22.55
GM:
0.42
BABA:
2.26
GM:
1.20
BABA:
1.75
GM:
$184.62B
BABA:
CN¥811.51B
GM:
$11.25B
BABA:
CN¥332.88B
GM:
$13.56B
BABA:
CN¥112.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GM vs. BABA — Risk / Return Rank
GM
BABA
GM vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Motors Company (GM) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GM | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.03 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.21 | -0.06 | +4.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.37 | -0.12 | +10.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GM vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GM drawdown since its inception was -59.96%, smaller than the maximum BABA drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GM and BABA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GM | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.96% | -80.09% | +20.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.00% | -39.94% | +23.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.02% | -39.94% | +5.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.96% | -72.48% | +13.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.96% | -80.09% | +20.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.22% | -62.20% | +56.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.51% | -37.56% | +16.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.48% | 19.58% | -13.10% |
Volatility
GM vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison
General Motors Company (GM) has a higher volatility of 11.54% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) at 10.07%. This indicates that GM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GM | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.54% | 10.07% | +1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.80% | 29.24% | -5.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.80% | 43.83% | -9.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.65% | 51.40% | -14.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.95% | 43.40% | -6.45% |
Dividends
GM vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison
GM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than BABA's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 0.93% | 1.36% | 1.96% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GM General Motors Company | 0.81% | 0.70% | 0.90% | 1.00% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.91% | 4.15% | 4.54% | 3.71% | 4.36% | 4.06% |
Financials
GM vs. BABA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Motors Company and Alibaba Group Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GM vs. BABA - Profitability Comparison
GM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Motors Company reported a gross profit of 5.00B and revenue of 43.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.
BABA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 11.75B and revenue of 35.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.
GM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Motors Company reported an operating income of 2.93B and revenue of 43.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
BABA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of -135.47M and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.
GM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Motors Company reported a net income of 2.63B and revenue of 43.62B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
BABA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 3.69B and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GM and BABA have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GM has higher volatility (11.54%) compared to BABA (10.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GM dropped -59.96% vs BABA's -80.09%.
GM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GM and BABA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer