GM vs. VOO
GM (General Motors Company) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, GM returned 13.71%/yr vs 15.14%/yr for VOO. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
GM vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GM having a 9.77% return and VOO slightly higher at 10.16%. Over the past 10 years, GM has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 13.71%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.
GM
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 16.92%
- 6M
- 6.27%
- YTD
- 9.77%
- 1Y
- 70.71%
- 3Y*
- 33.96%
- 5Y*
- 10.23%
- 10Y*
- 13.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.15%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 8.58%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 21.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $784.42M | $603.70M | $635.72M | |
| $3.82B | $3.78B | $5.44B |
GM vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GM General Motors Company | 9.77% | 54.24% | 49.84% | 7.92% | -42.36% | 40.80% | 15.16% | 14.02% | -15.06% | 22.51% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.16% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between GM and VOO is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2010 | 0.56 |
The correlation between GM and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GM vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
GM
VOO
GM vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Motors Company (GM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GM | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.28 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.28 | 2.21 | +2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.59 | 9.44 | +0.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GM vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GM drawdown since its inception was -59.96%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GM and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GM | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.96% | -33.99% | -25.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.00% | -8.90% | -7.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.10% | -18.69% | -10.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.96% | -24.52% | -34.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.96% | -33.99% | -25.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -1.38% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.39% | -3.67% | -17.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.13% | 2.08% | +5.05% |
Volatility
GM vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
General Motors Company (GM) has a higher volatility of 10.00% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.54%. This indicates that GM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GM | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.00% | 3.54% | +6.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.57% | 10.10% | +13.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.78% | 12.82% | +20.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.74% | 16.93% | +19.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.03% | 18.01% | +19.02% |
Dividends
GM vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
GM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than VOO's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GM General Motors Company | 0.74% | 0.70% | 0.90% | 1.00% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.91% | 4.15% | 4.54% | 3.71% | 4.36% | 4.06% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.07% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GM and VOO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GM has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to VOO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GM dropped -59.96% vs VOO's -33.99%.
GM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GM and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer