GLWG vs. SAA

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

GLWG (Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF) and SAA (ProShares Ultra SmallCap600) are both Leveraged Equities funds - GLWG tracks the Corning Incorporated (GLW) while SAA tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLWG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SAA.

Performance

GLWG vs. SAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF (GLWG) and ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GLWG

• 1D: -18.25%
• 1M: -29.91%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SAA

• 1D: 1.39%
• 1M: 6.27%
• 6M: 25.91%
• YTD: 44.68%
• 1Y: 64.14%
• 3Y*: 18.57%
• 5Y*: 6.48%
• 10Y*: 11.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLWG vs. SAA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GLWG Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF	2.72%
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600	35.45%

Correlation

The correlation between GLWG and SAA is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2026	0.49

Return for Risk

GLWG vs. SAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLWG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SAA

SAA Risk / Return Rank: 73
SAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
SAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
SAA Omega Ratio Rank: 61
SAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
SAA Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLWG vs. SAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF (GLWG) and ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLWG	SAA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.82	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.54	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.30	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.54	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.54	—

Drawdowns

GLWG vs. SAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLWG drawdown since its inception was -64.27%, smaller than the maximum SAA drawdown of -87.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLWG and SAA.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLWG	SAA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.27%	-87.39%	+23.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-18.21%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-50.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.37%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-74.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-64.27%	-1.83%	-62.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.12%	-27.27%	+10.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.58%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GLWG	SAA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.80%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	24.24%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	177.32%	35.46%	+141.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	177.32%	43.40%	+133.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	177.32%	45.99%	+131.33%

GLWG vs. SAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLWG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SAA's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLWG vs. SAA - Dividend Comparison

GLWG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GLWG Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600	0.75%	1.05%	1.36%	0.88%	0.46%	0.00%	0.03%	0.35%	0.27%	0.00%	0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLWG and SAA in my portfolio?

GLWG and SAA have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GLWG or SAA?

On fees, GLWG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLWG or SAA?

GLWG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SAA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLWG or SAA?

SAA has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.00% for GLWG.

What is the main difference between GLWG and SAA?

GLWG tracks Corning Incorporated (GLW), while SAA tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GLWG and 0.95% for SAA.