GLWG vs. FGRU
GLWG (Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF) and FGRU (T-REX 2X Long FIGR Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - GLWG tracks the Corning Incorporated (GLW) while FGRU tracks the Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. (FIGR). Both are passively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLWG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for FGRU.
Performance
GLWG vs. FGRU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GLWG
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 46.27%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FGRU
- 1D
- -6.91%
- 1M
- -29.87%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLWG vs. FGRU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GLWG Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF | 85.97% |
FGRU T-REX 2X Long FIGR Daily Target ETF | -48.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLWG and FGRU is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2026 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLWG vs. FGRU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF (GLWG) and T-REX 2X Long FIGR Daily Target ETF (FGRU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLWG | FGRU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 8.78 | -0.44 | +9.22 |
Drawdowns
GLWG vs. FGRU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLWG drawdown since its inception was -29.53%, smaller than the maximum FGRU drawdown of -57.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLWG and FGRU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLWG | FGRU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.53% | -57.59% | +28.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.32% | -51.37% | +41.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.71% | -30.60% | +19.89% |
Volatility
GLWG vs. FGRU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLWG | FGRU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 151.06% | 209.78% | -58.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 151.06% | 209.78% | -58.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 151.06% | 209.78% | -58.72% |
GLWG vs. FGRU - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLWG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FGRU's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLWG vs. FGRU - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLWG nor FGRU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLWG and FGRU have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLWG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLWG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for FGRU.
GLWG and FGRU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GLWG tracks Corning Incorporated (GLW), while FGRU tracks Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. (FIGR). They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GLWG and 1.50% for FGRU.
Find the right allocation for GLWG and FGRU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer