PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLWG vs. ASMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLWG vs. ASMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF (GLWG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GLWG

1D
0.42%
1M
46.27%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ASMG

1D
2.43%
1M
49.91%
YTD
127.56%
6M
96.41%
1Y
308.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLWG vs. ASMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GLWG and ASMG is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2026

0.68

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLWG vs. ASMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLWG

ASMG
ASMG Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ASMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ASMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASMG Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLWG vs. ASMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF (GLWG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GLWG vs. ASMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLWGASMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

8.78

1.89

+6.89

Drawdowns

GLWG vs. ASMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLWG drawdown since its inception was -29.53%, smaller than the maximum ASMG drawdown of -43.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLWG and ASMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLWGASMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.53%

-43.95%

+14.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.32%

0.00%

-10.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.71%

-13.28%

+2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.85%

Volatility

GLWG vs. ASMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLWGASMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

64.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

151.06%

81.15%

+69.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

151.06%

84.49%

+66.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

151.06%

84.49%

+66.57%

GLWG vs. ASMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GLWG and ASMG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

GLWG vs. ASMG - Dividend Comparison

GLWG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GLWG and ASMG have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLWG and ASMG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

ASMG has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 0.00% for GLWG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLWG and ASMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer