PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLW vs. MDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GLW vs. MDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Corning Incorporated (GLW) and Medtronic plc (MDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLW achieves a 114.91% return, which is significantly higher than MDT's -15.31% return. Over the past 10 years, GLW has outperformed MDT with an annualized return of 27.99%, while MDT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.04% annualized return.


GLW

1D
5.61%
1M
0.47%
YTD
114.91%
6M
113.18%
1Y
273.87%
3Y*
83.04%
5Y*
37.92%
10Y*
27.99%

MDT

1D
-1.20%
1M
5.96%
YTD
-15.31%
6M
-19.07%
1Y
-4.79%
3Y*
2.04%
5Y*
-5.25%
10Y*
2.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLW vs. MDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLW
Corning Incorporated
114.91%87.76%60.64%-1.23%-11.56%5.92%27.57%-1.02%-3.28%34.63%
MDT
Medtronic plc
-15.31%24.05%0.28%9.58%-22.55%-9.79%5.70%27.34%15.18%15.90%

Correlation

The correlation between GLW and MDT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1982

0.27

The correlation between GLW and MDT shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.37 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GLW:

$161.81B

MDT:

$103.94B

EPS

GLW:

$2.10

MDT:

$3.58

PE Ratio

GLW:

89.34

MDT:

22.52

PEG Ratio

GLW:

2.17

MDT:

2.03

PS Ratio

GLW:

9.91

MDT:

2.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

GLW:

$16.32B

MDT:

$35.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GLW:

$5.93B

MDT:

$5.78B

EBITDA (TTM)

GLW:

$3.77B

MDT:

$7.11B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLW vs. MDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLW
GLW Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
GLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLW Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
GLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLW Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

MDT
MDT Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
MDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
MDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDT Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLW vs. MDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corning Incorporated (GLW) and Medtronic plc (MDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLWMDTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

0.98

+0.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.99

-0.17

+12.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

39.68

-0.43

+40.11

GLW vs. MDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLW Sharpe Ratio is 4.97, which is higher than the MDT Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLW and MDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLWMDTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.97

-0.23

+5.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

-0.24

+1.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.09

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.47

-0.21

Drawdowns

GLW vs. MDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLW drawdown since its inception was -99.02%, which is greater than MDT's maximum drawdown of -57.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLW and MDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLWMDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.02%

-57.63%

-41.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.01%

-28.90%

+5.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.57%

-28.90%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.52%

-45.10%

+10.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.80%

-45.10%

-3.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.82%

-30.81%

+20.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.52%

-16.54%

-33.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.94%

11.17%

-4.23%

Volatility

GLW vs. MDT - Volatility Comparison

Corning Incorporated (GLW) has a higher volatility of 26.26% compared to Medtronic plc (MDT) at 10.04%. This indicates that GLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLWMDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.26%

10.04%

+16.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.84%

16.19%

+33.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.59%

20.95%

+34.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.57%

21.93%

+13.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.75%

23.24%

+10.51%

Dividends

GLW vs. MDT - Dividend Comparison

GLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than MDT's 3.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLW
Corning Incorporated
0.60%1.28%2.36%3.68%3.38%2.58%2.44%2.75%2.38%1.94%2.22%2.63%
MDT
Medtronic plc
3.52%2.95%3.49%3.34%3.44%2.39%1.95%1.87%2.15%2.24%2.34%1.88%

Financials

GLW vs. MDT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Corning Incorporated and Medtronic plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00B20222023202420252026
4.14B
9.02B
(GLW) Total Revenue
(MDT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GLW and MDT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLW has higher volatility (26.26%) compared to MDT (10.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLW dropped -99.02% vs MDT's -57.63%.

GLW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.97 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLW and MDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer