GLVYX vs. VGPMX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

GLVYX (Invesco Global Focus Fund) and VGPMX (Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GLVYX returned 13.02%/yr vs 10.33%/yr for VGPMX. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLVYX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for VGPMX.

Performance

GLVYX vs. VGPMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Focus Fund (GLVYX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLVYX achieves a 7.37% return, which is significantly lower than VGPMX's 11.77% return. Over the past 10 years, GLVYX has outperformed VGPMX with an annualized return of 13.02%, while VGPMX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.33% annualized return.

GLVYX

• 1D: -3.07%
• 1M: 0.77%
• YTD: 7.37%
• 6M: 6.68%
• 1Y: 14.83%
• 3Y*: 17.11%
• 5Y*: 3.62%
• 10Y*: 13.02%

VGPMX

• 1D: -2.38%
• 1M: -3.72%
• YTD: 11.77%
• 6M: 12.21%
• 1Y: 49.81%
• 3Y*: 28.09%
• 5Y*: 19.58%
• 10Y*: 10.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLVYX vs. VGPMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GLVYX Invesco Global Focus Fund	7.37%	14.51%	21.06%	37.34%	-37.74%	3.71%	56.61%	31.97%	-9.80%	25.42%
VGPMX Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund	11.77%	65.96%	5.78%	10.06%	7.34%	19.50%	17.21%	20.67%	-32.26%	13.75%

Correlation

The correlation between GLVYX and VGPMX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012	0.46

The correlation between GLVYX and VGPMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.63 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GLVYX vs. VGPMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLVYX

GLVYX Risk / Return Rank: 16
GLVYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
GLVYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
GLVYX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
GLVYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
GLVYX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

VGPMX

VGPMX Risk / Return Rank: 86
VGPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
VGPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
VGPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
VGPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
VGPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLVYX vs. VGPMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Focus Fund (GLVYX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLVYX	VGPMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	2.86	-1.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.39	3.51	-2.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.49	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.07	4.00	-2.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.72	15.68	-11.96

GLVYX vs. VGPMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLVYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the VGPMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLVYX and VGPMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GLVYX vs. VGPMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLVYX drawdown since its inception was -49.55%, smaller than the maximum VGPMX drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLVYX and VGPMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLVYX	VGPMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.55%	-78.85%	+29.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.19%	-12.80%	-3.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.19%	-14.63%	-7.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.55%	-22.71%	-26.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.55%	-54.59%	+5.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.45%	-7.74%	+3.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.41%	-34.51%	+25.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.66%	3.26%	+1.40%

Volatility

GLVYX vs. VGPMX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Global Focus Fund (GLVYX) has a higher volatility of 9.12% compared to Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) at 7.28%. This indicates that GLVYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGPMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLVYX	VGPMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.12%	7.28%	+1.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.32%	15.29%	+0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.41%	17.89%	+0.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.61%	17.53%	+6.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.59%	20.89%	+1.70%

GLVYX vs. VGPMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLVYX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than VGPMX's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLVYX vs. VGPMX - Dividend Comparison

GLVYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.42%, more than VGPMX's 3.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLVYX Invesco Global Focus Fund	11.42%	12.26%	1.53%	0.00%	0.00%	3.91%	4.43%	9.77%	4.17%	1.81%	0.00%	0.00%
VGPMX Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund	3.49%	2.59%	2.68%	3.22%	3.27%	3.26%	2.03%	2.39%	3.02%	0.02%	1.72%	2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLVYX and VGPMX in my portfolio?

GLVYX and VGPMX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLVYX or VGPMX?

GLVYX has higher volatility (9.12%) compared to VGPMX (7.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLVYX dropped -49.55% vs VGPMX's -78.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VGPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.