PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLUX.DE vs. WELW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLUX.DE vs. WELW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR (GLUX.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Consumer Staples ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLUX.DE achieves a -7.03% return, which is significantly lower than WELW.DE's 3.14% return.


GLUX.DE

1D
-0.12%
1M
4.80%
YTD
-7.03%
6M
-6.01%
1Y
2.52%
3Y*
-0.97%
5Y*
0.25%
10Y*
9.44%

WELW.DE

1D
-0.10%
1M
-2.28%
YTD
3.14%
6M
1.88%
1Y
-3.09%
3Y*
-0.01%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLUX.DE vs. WELW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GLUX.DE
Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR
-7.03%2.34%4.43%11.98%4.62%
WELW.DE
Amundi S&P Global Consumer Staples ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc
3.14%-7.11%9.48%-1.99%5.34%

Correlation

The correlation between GLUX.DE and WELW.DE is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLUX.DE vs. WELW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLUX.DE
GLUX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
GLUX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLUX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLUX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
GLUX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLUX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

WELW.DE
WELW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
WELW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WELW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
WELW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
WELW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
WELW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLUX.DE vs. WELW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR (GLUX.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Consumer Staples ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLUX.DEWELW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.97

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

-0.34

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.39

-0.62

+1.01

GLUX.DE vs. WELW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLUX.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is higher than the WELW.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLUX.DE and WELW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLUX.DEWELW.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

-0.24

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.19

+0.25

Drawdowns

GLUX.DE vs. WELW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLUX.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.20%, which is greater than WELW.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLUX.DE and WELW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLUX.DEWELW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.20%

-13.88%

-29.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.00%

-9.17%

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.94%

-13.88%

-14.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.70%

-8.99%

-5.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.35%

-5.45%

-3.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.51%

4.96%

+1.55%

Volatility

GLUX.DE vs. WELW.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR (GLUX.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to Amundi S&P Global Consumer Staples ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELW.DE) at 4.91%. This indicates that GLUX.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WELW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLUX.DEWELW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

4.91%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.60%

10.31%

+5.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.60%

12.66%

+6.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.08%

11.48%

+9.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.94%

11.48%

+9.46%

GLUX.DE vs. WELW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLUX.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than WELW.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GLUX.DE vs. WELW.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLUX.DE nor WELW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GLUX.DE and WELW.DE have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WELW.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WELW.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GLUX.DE.

GLUX.DE tracks S&P Global Luxury, while WELW.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Consumer Staples. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GLUX.DE and 0.18% for WELW.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLUX.DE and WELW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer