GLUX.DE vs. LSMC.DE
GLUX.DE (Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR) and LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLUX.DE is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Luxury, while LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GLUX.DE returned 9.44%/yr vs 28.49%/yr for LSMC.DE. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLUX.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LSMC.DE.
Performance
GLUX.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLUX.DE achieves a -7.03% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 63.83% return. Over the past 10 years, GLUX.DE has underperformed LSMC.DE with an annualized return of 9.44%, while LSMC.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 28.49% annualized return.
GLUX.DE
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -6.01%
- 1Y
- 2.52%
- 3Y*
- -0.97%
- 5Y*
- 0.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.44%
LSMC.DE
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- 16.45%
- YTD
- 63.83%
- 6M
- 64.57%
- 1Y
- 130.64%
- 3Y*
- 62.06%
- 5Y*
- 36.20%
- 10Y*
- 28.49%
GLUX.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLUX.DE Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR | -7.03% | 2.34% | 4.43% | 11.98% | -19.34% | 32.41% | 23.80% | 33.53% | -9.13% | 22.10% |
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 63.83% | 32.60% | 66.54% | 74.46% | -34.66% | 37.56% | 23.03% | 39.73% | -5.73% | 12.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLUX.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2010 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GLUX.DE and LSMC.DE has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLUX.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
GLUX.DE
LSMC.DE
GLUX.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR (GLUX.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLUX.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.59 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 10.37 | -10.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.39 | 32.83 | -32.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLUX.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 | 4.27 | -4.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 1.15 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 1.09 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.82 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
GLUX.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLUX.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.20%, which is greater than LSMC.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLUX.DE and LSMC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLUX.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.20% | -39.77% | -3.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.00% | -12.53% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.94% | -36.22% | +8.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.52% | -39.77% | +9.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.20% | -39.77% | -3.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.70% | -3.34% | -11.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.35% | -9.37% | +0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.51% | 3.96% | +2.55% |
Volatility
GLUX.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR (GLUX.DE) is 5.55%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 11.23%. This indicates that GLUX.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLUX.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.55% | 11.23% | -5.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.60% | 22.18% | -6.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.60% | 30.40% | -10.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.08% | 31.21% | -10.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.94% | 26.06% | -5.12% |
GLUX.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLUX.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLUX.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLUX.DE nor LSMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLUX.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLUX.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLUX.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
GLUX.DE is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. GLUX.DE tracks S&P Global Luxury, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GLUX.DE and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
Find the right allocation for GLUX.DE and LSMC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer