GLRY vs. TMFM

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

GLRY (Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF) and TMFM (Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLRY is a Momentum fund actively managed by Inspire, while TMFM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GLRY returned 16.92%/yr vs 2.45%/yr for TMFM. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.

Performance

GLRY vs. TMFM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) and Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLRY achieves a 14.87% return, which is significantly higher than TMFM's -5.52% return.

GLRY

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: -2.48%
• 6M: 7.27%
• YTD: 14.87%
• 1Y: 25.38%
• 3Y*: 16.92%
• 5Y*: 9.49%
• 10Y*: —

TMFM

• 1D: 1.85%
• 1M: 4.42%
• 6M: -8.00%
• YTD: -5.52%
• 1Y: -15.26%
• 3Y*: 2.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLRY vs. TMFM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GLRY Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF	14.87%	16.50%	16.59%	19.58%	-22.50%	2.34%
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF	-5.52%	-8.98%	17.54%	21.81%	-27.36%	1.91%

Correlation

The correlation between GLRY and TMFM is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2021	0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between GLRY and TMFM has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GLRY vs. TMFM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GLRY	TMFM
Technology	27.6%	31.7%
Industrials	24.6%	20.2%
Consumer Cyclical	12.0%	3.4%
Financial Services	10.2%	13.6%
Healthcare	8.1%	24.2%
Communication Services	6.3%	-
Utilities	3.0%	-
Real Estate	2.6%	4.6%
Energy	2.5%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.4%	2.3%

Return for Risk

GLRY vs. TMFM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLRY

GLRY Risk / Return Rank: 49
GLRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
GLRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
GLRY Omega Ratio Rank: 43
GLRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
GLRY Martin Ratio Rank: 56

TMFM

TMFM Risk / Return Rank: 4
TMFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
TMFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
TMFM Omega Ratio Rank: 3
TMFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
TMFM Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLRY vs. TMFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) and Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLRY	TMFM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	-0.80	+2.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.80	-1.10	+2.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	0.88	+0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	-0.58	+2.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.75	-0.99	+8.74

GLRY vs. TMFM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLRY Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the TMFM Sharpe Ratio of -0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLRY and TMFM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GLRY vs. TMFM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLRY drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, which is greater than TMFM's maximum drawdown of -31.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRY and TMFM.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLRY	TMFM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.60%	-31.75%	-8.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.89%	-26.59%	+15.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.50%	-31.75%	+11.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.95%	-23.12%	+17.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.75%	-16.08%	+0.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.28%	15.47%	-12.19%

Volatility

GLRY vs. TMFM - Volatility Comparison

Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) has a higher volatility of 7.49% compared to Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) at 5.64%. This indicates that GLRY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLRY	TMFM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.49%	5.64%	+1.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.70%	16.01%	+0.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.94%	19.15%	+0.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.26%	20.56%	-0.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.51%	20.56%	+0.95%

GLRY vs. TMFM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GLRY and TMFM have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

Dividends

GLRY vs. TMFM - Dividend Comparison

GLRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, more than TMFM's 0.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GLRY Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF	0.17%	0.34%	0.52%	1.07%	1.04%	4.00%
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.07%	0.06%	16.27%	2.55%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLRY and TMFM in my portfolio?

GLRY and TMFM have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLRY or TMFM?

GLRY has higher volatility (7.49%) compared to TMFM (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLRY dropped -40.60% vs TMFM's -31.75%.

Which ETF is better, GLRY or TMFM?

On 3-year performance, GLRY leads with 16.92% vs 2.45% for TMFM. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, TMFM has been the lower-risk option at 5.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GLRY or TMFM?

Over the 3-year period, GLRY has performed better with a 16.92% return vs 2.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLRY or TMFM?

GLRY and TMFM have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLRY or TMFM?

GLRY has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.07% for TMFM.

What is the main difference between GLRY and TMFM?

GLRY is categorized as Momentum, while TMFM is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Motley Fool.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLRY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.