GLRY vs. MTUL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GLRY (Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF) and MTUL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN) are both Momentum funds. GLRY is actively managed, while MTUL is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLRY returned 8.85%/yr vs 20.61%/yr for MTUL. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLRY charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for MTUL.

Performance

GLRY vs. MTUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLRY achieves a 16.65% return, which is significantly lower than MTUL's 61.42% return.

GLRY

• 1D: 1.71%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 16.65%
• 6M: 15.36%
• 1Y: 30.29%
• 3Y*: 20.80%
• 5Y*: 8.85%
• 10Y*: —

MTUL

• 1D: 4.73%
• 1M: 28.31%
• YTD: 61.42%
• 6M: 62.09%
• 1Y: 78.29%
• 3Y*: 59.88%
• 5Y*: 20.61%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLRY vs. MTUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GLRY Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF	16.65%	16.50%	16.59%	19.58%	-22.50%	-8.68%
MTUL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN	61.42%	27.42%	58.70%	10.66%	-37.97%	7.00%

Correlation

The correlation between GLRY and MTUL is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2021	0.77

The correlation between GLRY and MTUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GLRY vs. MTUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLRY

GLRY Risk / Return Rank: 50
GLRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
GLRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
GLRY Omega Ratio Rank: 47
GLRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
GLRY Martin Ratio Rank: 56

MTUL

MTUL Risk / Return Rank: 58
MTUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
MTUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
MTUL Omega Ratio Rank: 51
MTUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
MTUL Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLRY vs. MTUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLRY	MTUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	1.79	-0.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	2.38	-0.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.32	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	3.37	-0.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.83	13.47	-3.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLRY vs. MTUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLRY Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the MTUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLRY and MTUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLRY	MTUL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.67	1.79	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	0.48	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.41	+0.11

Drawdowns

GLRY vs. MTUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLRY drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, smaller than the maximum MTUL drawdown of -56.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRY and MTUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLRY	MTUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.60%	-56.83%	+16.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.89%	-23.86%	+12.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.50%	-39.15%	+18.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.63%	-56.83%	+22.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	0.00%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.05%	-22.69%	+6.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.13%	5.96%	-2.83%

Volatility

GLRY vs. MTUL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) is 5.63%, while ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL) has a volatility of 20.26%. This indicates that GLRY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLRY	MTUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.63%	20.26%	-14.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.18%	37.70%	-22.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.19%	43.98%	-25.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.06%	42.81%	-22.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.41%	43.66%	-22.25%

GLRY vs. MTUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLRY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than MTUL's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLRY vs. MTUL - Dividend Comparison

GLRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, while MTUL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GLRY Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF	0.24%	0.34%	0.52%	1.07%	1.04%	4.00%
MTUL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLRY and MTUL in my portfolio?

GLRY and MTUL have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLRY or MTUL?

MTUL has higher volatility (20.26%) compared to GLRY (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLRY dropped -40.60% vs MTUL's -56.83%.

Which ETF is better, GLRY or MTUL?

On 5-year performance, MTUL leads with 20.61% vs 8.85% for GLRY. On fees, GLRY is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, GLRY has been the lower-risk option at 5.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GLRY or MTUL?

Over the 5-year period, MTUL has performed better with a 20.61% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLRY or MTUL?

GLRY is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MTUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLRY or MTUL?

GLRY has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.00% for MTUL.

What is the main difference between GLRY and MTUL?

They also come from different issuers: Inspire and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GLRY and 0.95% for MTUL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MTUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.