PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLRY vs. BKMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLRY vs. BKMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) and BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLRY achieves a 17.07% return, which is significantly higher than BKMC's 11.69% return.


GLRY

1D
0.36%
1M
2.25%
YTD
17.07%
6M
15.71%
1Y
29.59%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*

BKMC

1D
0.40%
1M
3.22%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.55%
1Y
24.74%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLRY vs. BKMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GLRY
Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF
17.07%16.50%16.59%19.58%-22.50%15.97%4.13%
BKMC
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
11.69%8.74%13.78%17.50%-16.03%23.83%1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between GLRY and BKMC is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020

0.87

The correlation between GLRY and BKMC shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GLRY vs. BKMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GLRY
BKMC

Technology

32.3%
16.2%

Industrials

24.6%
22.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
9.1%

Financial Services

10.2%
12.4%

Healthcare

8.1%
11.4%

Utilities

3.0%
2.4%

Real Estate

2.6%
7.6%

Energy

2.5%
3.3%

Basic Materials

1.8%
4.6%

Communication Services

1.6%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
4.3%

Technology

GLRY
32.3%
BKMC
16.2%

Industrials

GLRY
24.6%
BKMC
22.9%

Consumer Cyclical

GLRY
11.9%
BKMC
9.1%

Financial Services

GLRY
10.2%
BKMC
12.4%

Healthcare

GLRY
8.1%
BKMC
11.4%

Utilities

GLRY
3.0%
BKMC
2.4%

Real Estate

GLRY
2.6%
BKMC
7.6%

Energy

GLRY
2.5%
BKMC
3.3%

Basic Materials

GLRY
1.8%
BKMC
4.6%

Communication Services

GLRY
1.6%
BKMC
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

GLRY
1.4%
BKMC
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLRY vs. BKMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLRY
GLRY Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GLRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLRY Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
GLRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLRY Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

BKMC
BKMC Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
BKMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKMC Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
BKMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKMC Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLRY vs. BKMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) and BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLRYBKMCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.64

1.64

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.24

2.40

-0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.29

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

2.52

+0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.48

9.72

-0.24

GLRY vs. BKMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLRY Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the BKMC Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLRY and BKMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLRYBKMCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

1.64

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.43

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.83

-0.31

Drawdowns

GLRY vs. BKMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLRY drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, which is greater than BKMC's maximum drawdown of -25.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRY and BKMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLRYBKMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.60%

-25.02%

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.89%

-9.82%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.50%

-23.68%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.63%

-25.02%

-9.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.04%

-6.55%

-9.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

2.55%

+0.58%

Volatility

GLRY vs. BKMC - Volatility Comparison

Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) at 4.20%. This indicates that GLRY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLRYBKMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

4.20%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.14%

10.97%

+4.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.19%

15.12%

+3.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.06%

18.77%

+1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.41%

19.16%

+2.25%

GLRY vs. BKMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLRY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BKMC's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLRY vs. BKMC - Dividend Comparison

GLRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than BKMC's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BKMC
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
1.38%1.35%1.54%1.38%1.63%1.15%0.86%
GLRY
Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF
0.24%0.34%0.52%1.07%1.04%4.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLRY and BKMC have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLRY has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to BKMC (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLRY dropped -40.60% vs BKMC's -25.02%.

On 5-year performance, GLRY leads with 8.81% vs 8.06% for BKMC. On fees, BKMC is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GLRY has performed better with a 8.81% return vs 8.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKMC is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GLRY.

BKMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.24% for GLRY.

GLRY is categorized as Momentum, while BKMC is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GLRY and 0.04% for BKMC.

BKMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLRY and BKMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer