PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLRE.L vs. XREP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLRE.L vs. XREP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) and Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP (XREP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GLRE.L is traded in USD, while XREP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XREP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLRE.L achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly lower than XREP.L's 9.03% return.


GLRE.L

1D
0.19%
1M
-1.25%
YTD
6.61%
6M
6.73%
1Y
12.07%
3Y*
8.79%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*
3.13%

XREP.L

1D
0.14%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
9.03%
6M
9.04%
1Y
9.34%
3Y*
9.48%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLRE.L vs. XREP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GLRE.L
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
6.61%9.96%-0.53%11.24%7.71%
XREP.L
Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP
9.03%4.22%2.34%12.23%7.91%

Correlation

The correlation between GLRE.L and XREP.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2022

0.87

The correlation between GLRE.L and XREP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

GLRE.L vs. XREP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GLRE.L
XREP.L

Real Estate

99.9%
100.0%

Industrials

0.0%

-

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Utilities

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Technology

-

-

Real Estate

GLRE.L
99.9%
XREP.L
100.0%

Industrials

GLRE.L
0.0%
XREP.L

-

Financial Services

GLRE.L
0.0%
XREP.L

-

Utilities

GLRE.L
0.0%
XREP.L

-

Basic Materials

GLRE.L

-

XREP.L

-

Communication Services

GLRE.L

-

XREP.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

GLRE.L

-

XREP.L

-

Consumer Defensive

GLRE.L

-

XREP.L

-

Energy

GLRE.L

-

XREP.L

-

Healthcare

GLRE.L

-

XREP.L

-

Technology

GLRE.L

-

XREP.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLRE.L vs. XREP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLRE.L
GLRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
GLRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
GLRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

XREP.L
XREP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XREP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XREP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
XREP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
XREP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
XREP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLRE.L vs. XREP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) and Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP (XREP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLRE.LXREP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.18

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

0.32

+0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.80

0.48

+4.32

GLRE.L vs. XREP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLRE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the XREP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLRE.L and XREP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLRE.LXREP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

0.21

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.35

-0.08

Drawdowns

GLRE.L vs. XREP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLRE.L drawdown since its inception was -43.26%, which is greater than XREP.L's maximum drawdown of -28.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRE.L and XREP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLRE.LXREP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.26%

-28.63%

-14.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-28.63%

+19.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.30%

-28.63%

+10.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

-20.87%

+17.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.11%

-9.73%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

19.33%

-16.82%

Volatility

GLRE.L vs. XREP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) is 3.84%, while Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP (XREP.L) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that GLRE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XREP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLRE.LXREP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

4.27%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.29%

9.75%

-0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.30%

44.18%

-31.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.86%

28.34%

-11.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.67%

28.34%

-10.67%

GLRE.L vs. XREP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLRE.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XREP.L's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLRE.L vs. XREP.L - Dividend Comparison

GLRE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, while XREP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLRE.L
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
2.58%2.72%2.79%2.62%2.85%1.82%2.51%3.16%3.54%3.86%2.66%2.15%
XREP.L
Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLRE.L and XREP.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XREP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XREP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLRE.L.

GLRE.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while XREP.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Real Estate Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLRE.L and 0.14% for XREP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLRE.L and XREP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer