XREP.L vs. DPYA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP (XREP.L) and iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPYA.L).
XREP.L and DPYA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XREP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Real Estate Index. It was launched on Feb 17, 2016. DPYA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. It was launched on May 10, 2018. Both XREP.L and DPYA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XREP.L vs. DPYA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XREP.L vs. DPYA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XREP.L Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP | 2.97% | -3.09% | 4.07% | 6.60% | 1.33% |
DPYA.L iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 3.40% | 1.47% | 1.65% | 4.22% | 0.58% |
Different Trading Currencies
XREP.L is traded in GBp, while DPYA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DPYA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XREP.L achieves a 2.97% return, which is significantly lower than DPYA.L's 3.40% return.
XREP.L
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -5.27%
- YTD
- 2.97%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- -1.13%
- 3Y*
- 4.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DPYA.L
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- -5.61%
- YTD
- 3.40%
- 6M
- 2.39%
- 1Y
- 5.38%
- 3Y*
- 4.33%
- 5Y*
- 2.44%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XREP.L vs. DPYA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XREP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than DPYA.L's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XREP.L vs. DPYA.L — Risk / Return Rank
XREP.L
DPYA.L
XREP.L vs. DPYA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP (XREP.L) and iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPYA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XREP.L | DPYA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | 0.37 | -0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.31 | 0.59 | -0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.08 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 0.70 | -0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.07 | 2.18 | -2.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XREP.L | DPYA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 | 0.37 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.17 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between XREP.L and DPYA.L is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XREP.L vs. DPYA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XREP.L nor DPYA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XREP.L vs. DPYA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XREP.L drawdown since its inception was -29.50%, smaller than the maximum DPYA.L drawdown of -36.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XREP.L and DPYA.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XREP.L | DPYA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.50% | -42.96% | +13.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.50% | -11.39% | -18.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.07% | -8.35% | -17.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.04% | -12.59% | +1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.67% | 2.87% | +14.80% |
Volatility
XREP.L vs. DPYA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP (XREP.L) is 4.24%, while iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPYA.L) has a volatility of 5.35%. This indicates that XREP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DPYA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XREP.L | DPYA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 5.35% | -1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.31% | 9.00% | +33.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.05% | 14.39% | +30.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.92% | 14.98% | +12.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.92% | 17.06% | +10.86% |