XREP.L vs. VNQI
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP (XREP.L) and Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI).
XREP.L and VNQI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XREP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Real Estate Index. It was launched on Feb 17, 2016. VNQI is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P Global ex-U.S. Property Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2010. Both XREP.L and VNQI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XREP.L or VNQI.
Key characteristics
| XREP.L | VNQI | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 9.44% | 1.64% |
| 1Y Return | 25.97% | 15.49% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.78 | 1.07 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.56 | 1.61 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.32 | 1.19 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.81 | 0.51 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.79 | 4.22 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.89% | 3.78% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.82% | 14.97% |
| Max Drawdown | -21.30% | -38.35% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.30% | -20.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between XREP.L and VNQI is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XREP.L vs. VNQI - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XREP.L achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly higher than VNQI's 1.64% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XREP.L vs. VNQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XREP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than VNQI's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XREP.L vs. VNQI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP (XREP.L) and Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XREP.L vs. VNQI - Dividend Comparison
XREP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VNQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XREP.L Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VNQI Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF | 3.68% | 3.74% | 0.57% | 6.48% | 0.93% | 7.57% | 4.62% | 3.86% | 5.18% | 2.86% | 4.11% | 3.27% |
Drawdowns
XREP.L vs. VNQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XREP.L drawdown since its inception was -21.30%, smaller than the maximum VNQI drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XREP.L and VNQI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XREP.L vs. VNQI - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP (XREP.L) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) at 4.16%. This indicates that XREP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.