GLRE.L vs. AREG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GLRE.L (SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) and AREG.L (abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF) are both REIT funds. GLRE.L is passively managed, while AREG.L is actively managed. Over the past year, GLRE.L returned 12.07% vs 7.92% for AREG.L. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.

Performance

GLRE.L vs. AREG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) and abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (AREG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

GLRE.L is traded in USD, while AREG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AREG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLRE.L achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly higher than AREG.L's 4.70% return.

GLRE.L

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -1.25%
• YTD: 6.61%
• 6M: 6.73%
• 1Y: 12.07%
• 3Y*: 8.79%
• 5Y*: 1.34%
• 10Y*: 3.13%

AREG.L

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: -1.53%
• YTD: 4.70%
• 6M: 5.22%
• 1Y: 7.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLRE.L vs. AREG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GLRE.L SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF	6.61%	9.96%	6.50%
AREG.L abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF	4.70%	8.05%	4.09%

Correlation

The correlation between GLRE.L and AREG.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2024	0.89

The correlation between GLRE.L and AREG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GLRE.L vs. AREG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLRE.L

GLRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 28
GLRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
GLRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
GLRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 26
GLRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
GLRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33

AREG.L

AREG.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
AREG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
AREG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
AREG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 21
AREG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
AREG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLRE.L vs. AREG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) and abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (AREG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLRE.L	AREG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	0.64	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.48	0.98	+0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.11	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	0.71	+0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.80	2.44	+2.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLRE.L vs. AREG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLRE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the AREG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLRE.L and AREG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLRE.L	AREG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98	0.64	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.57	-0.30

Drawdowns

GLRE.L vs. AREG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLRE.L drawdown since its inception was -43.26%, which is greater than AREG.L's maximum drawdown of -20.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRE.L and AREG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLRE.L	AREG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.26%	-20.06%	-23.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.30%	-11.08%	+1.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.26%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.54%	-5.48%	+1.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.11%	-5.36%	-4.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.51%	3.24%	-0.73%

Volatility

GLRE.L vs. AREG.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) and abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (AREG.L) have volatilities of 3.84% and 3.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLRE.L	AREG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.84%	3.78%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.29%	9.63%	-0.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.30%	12.25%	+0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.86%	13.96%	+2.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.67%	13.96%	+3.71%

GLRE.L vs. AREG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GLRE.L and AREG.L have an expense ratio of 0.40%.

Dividends

GLRE.L vs. AREG.L - Dividend Comparison

GLRE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, while AREG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AREG.L abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GLRE.L SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF	2.58%	2.72%	2.79%	2.62%	2.85%	1.82%	2.51%	3.16%	3.54%	3.86%	2.66%	2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLRE.L and AREG.L in my portfolio?

GLRE.L and AREG.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GLRE.L or AREG.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLRE.L or AREG.L?

GLRE.L and AREG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

What is the main difference between GLRE.L and AREG.L?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and abrdn.