GLQ vs. YFSNX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GLQ (Clough Global Equity Fund) and YFSNX (AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GLQ returned 0.45%/yr vs 8.07%/yr for YFSNX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLQ charges 0.03%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for YFSNX.

Performance

GLQ vs. YFSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clough Global Equity Fund (GLQ) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLQ achieves a 14.72% return, which is significantly lower than YFSNX's 22.30% return.

GLQ

• 1D: -2.46%
• 1M: -0.80%
• YTD: 14.72%
• 6M: 14.72%
• 1Y: 35.74%
• 3Y*: 24.70%
• 5Y*: 0.45%
• 10Y*: 9.70%

YFSNX

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: -0.70%
• YTD: 22.30%
• 6M: 24.62%
• 1Y: 22.53%
• 3Y*: 15.99%
• 5Y*: 8.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLQ vs. YFSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GLQ Clough Global Equity Fund	14.72%	28.55%	25.41%	2.67%	-42.31%	6.48%	28.28%	23.94%	-9.74%	25.91%
YFSNX AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N	22.30%	14.79%	-0.47%	16.48%	-9.39%	13.00%	18.32%	24.48%	2.18%	20.95%

Correlation

The correlation between GLQ and YFSNX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017	0.51

The correlation between GLQ and YFSNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GLQ vs. YFSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLQ

GLQ Risk / Return Rank: 77
GLQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
GLQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
GLQ Omega Ratio Rank: 76
GLQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
GLQ Martin Ratio Rank: 76

YFSNX

YFSNX Risk / Return Rank: 19
YFSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
YFSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
YFSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
YFSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
YFSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLQ vs. YFSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clough Global Equity Fund (GLQ) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLQ	YFSNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	1.01	+1.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	1.21	+2.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.25	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.38	1.56	+1.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.45	4.84	+8.61

GLQ vs. YFSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the YFSNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLQ and YFSNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GLQ vs. YFSNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLQ drawdown since its inception was -64.45%, which is greater than YFSNX's maximum drawdown of -35.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLQ and YFSNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLQ	YFSNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.45%	-35.14%	-29.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.61%	-14.09%	+3.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.18%	-14.29%	-4.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.47%	-25.26%	-32.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.26%	-4.55%	-2.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.27%	-4.93%	-12.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	4.51%	-1.85%

Volatility

GLQ vs. YFSNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Clough Global Equity Fund (GLQ) is 4.88%, while AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) has a volatility of 6.69%. This indicates that GLQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YFSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLQ	YFSNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.88%	6.69%	-1.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.92%	21.31%	-9.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.77%	21.83%	-7.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.18%	15.54%	+4.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.01%	16.29%	+5.72%

GLQ vs. YFSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLQ has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than YFSNX's 1.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLQ vs. YFSNX - Dividend Comparison

GLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.93%, while YFSNX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLQ Clough Global Equity Fund	9.93%	10.18%	10.86%	12.13%	21.42%	12.25%	9.66%	10.96%	13.68%	9.63%	11.68%	11.01%
YFSNX AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N	0.00%	0.00%	8.40%	7.86%	4.33%	8.06%	4.71%	6.59%	0.71%	2.63%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLQ and YFSNX in my portfolio?

GLQ and YFSNX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLQ or YFSNX?

YFSNX has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to GLQ (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLQ dropped -64.45% vs YFSNX's -35.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.