GLQ vs. UCEQX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GLQ (Clough Global Equity Fund) and UCEQX (USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GLQ returned 9.70%/yr vs 12.04%/yr for UCEQX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLQ charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for UCEQX.

Performance

GLQ vs. UCEQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clough Global Equity Fund (GLQ) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLQ achieves a 14.72% return, which is significantly higher than UCEQX's 13.82% return. Over the past 10 years, GLQ has underperformed UCEQX with an annualized return of 9.70%, while UCEQX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.04% annualized return.

GLQ

• 1D: -2.46%
• 1M: -0.80%
• YTD: 14.72%
• 6M: 14.72%
• 1Y: 35.74%
• 3Y*: 24.70%
• 5Y*: 0.45%
• 10Y*: 9.70%

UCEQX

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 2.23%
• YTD: 13.82%
• 6M: 13.16%
• 1Y: 29.80%
• 3Y*: 21.16%
• 5Y*: 11.24%
• 10Y*: 12.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLQ vs. UCEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GLQ Clough Global Equity Fund	14.72%	28.55%	25.41%	2.67%	-42.31%	6.48%	28.28%	23.94%	-9.74%	32.83%
UCEQX USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund	13.82%	23.71%	14.50%	19.36%	-16.25%	19.68%	10.76%	22.49%	-12.06%	22.59%

Correlation

The correlation between GLQ and UCEQX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2012	0.66

The correlation between GLQ and UCEQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GLQ vs. UCEQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLQ

GLQ Risk / Return Rank: 77
GLQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
GLQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
GLQ Omega Ratio Rank: 76
GLQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
GLQ Martin Ratio Rank: 76

UCEQX

UCEQX Risk / Return Rank: 78
UCEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
UCEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
UCEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
UCEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
UCEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLQ vs. UCEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clough Global Equity Fund (GLQ) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLQ	UCEQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	2.38	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	3.24	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.44	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.38	3.45	-0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.45	15.10	-1.65

GLQ vs. UCEQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the UCEQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLQ and UCEQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GLQ vs. UCEQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLQ drawdown since its inception was -64.45%, which is greater than UCEQX's maximum drawdown of -35.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLQ and UCEQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLQ	UCEQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.45%	-35.33%	-29.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.61%	-8.96%	-1.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.18%	-15.64%	-3.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.47%	-25.24%	-32.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.47%	-35.33%	-22.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.26%	-0.72%	-6.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.27%	-4.86%	-12.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	2.04%	+0.62%

Volatility

GLQ vs. UCEQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Clough Global Equity Fund (GLQ) is 4.88%, while USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that GLQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCEQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLQ	UCEQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.88%	5.17%	-0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.92%	10.68%	+1.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.77%	13.02%	+1.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.18%	15.38%	+4.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.01%	16.55%	+5.46%

GLQ vs. UCEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLQ has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than UCEQX's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GLQ vs. UCEQX - Dividend Comparison

GLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.93%, more than UCEQX's 4.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLQ Clough Global Equity Fund	9.93%	10.18%	10.86%	12.13%	21.42%	12.25%	9.66%	10.96%	13.68%	9.63%	11.68%	11.01%
UCEQX USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund	4.46%	5.08%	2.56%	5.10%	6.80%	4.61%	8.25%	4.79%	6.73%	1.91%	3.16%	3.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLQ and UCEQX in my portfolio?

GLQ and UCEQX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLQ or UCEQX?

UCEQX has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to GLQ (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLQ dropped -64.45% vs UCEQX's -35.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.